Home Blog Page 788

Fed Pols Mostly Mum on Trump Israeli Ambassador Appointment

By Stephen Witt

U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, considered something of an Israeli war hawk and usually known to weigh in on just about anything, has remained quiet on one of President-elect Donald Trump’s more controversial appointments – Long Island bankruptcy attorney David Friedman as the U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

Friedman, 58, does not believe in the long-held American policy of a two-state solution, and is president of the American Friends of Bet El Yeshiva, the American fundraising arm for the controversial West Bank settlement of Bet-El. Additionally, he has likened the ultra-Left lobbying group J-Street to “kapos”, Jews who cooperated with the Nazis in World War II. Friedman also believes that America should recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and not Tel-Aviv – something that America has refused to do since Israel annexed half the city following the 1967 Israeli War.

Friedman’s appointment has also furthered the growing rift among American Jews, who have always included a large number of Left-leaning liberal thinkers versus their Right-leaning, highly religious American-Jewish counterparts – a good number of which live in Brooklyn.

KCP contacted Schumer’s office numerous times in the past two days for a response and neither phone calls or e-mails were returned. Ditto for Brooklyn Congress members Hakeem Jeffries and Nydia Velazquez, while Congress member Yvette Clarke issued a “no comment”.

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Schumer’s non-Jewish counterpart representing New York in the Senate, issued the following statement through her spokesperson Marc Brumer: “Senator Gillibrand has serious concerns about David Friedman’s nomination and will be looking to hear those concerns addressed during his confirmation hearings.”

Ultraliberal Congressman Jerrold Nadler, whose district includes the highly Left-leaning Upper West Side of Manhattan and Western Greenwich Village as well as the highly Right-leaning neighborhoods of Borough Park and parts of Bensonhurst in Brooklyn, called Friedman’s appointment “an insult to the majority of American Jews”.

“The nomination of David Friedman as the new U.S. Ambassador to Israel underscores, yet again, the extremist agenda of Donald Trump and his administration.  This is an appointment with dangerous consequences for both the United States and Israel, not only with respect to the prospect of an eventual negotiated peace between Israel and the Palestinians, but also with respect to the relationship between our two countries, and more generally, to regional stability,” said Nadler.

“Mr. Friedman’s views and comments about a two-state solution are not only a total break from decades of American and Israeli policy, but are fundamentally out-of-step with the views of the majority of American Jews.  Support for a two-state solution is not only official U.S. policy, it is also the official Israeli policy when it comes to a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians.  Breaking from this position undermines the longstanding diplomatic alignment between our two countries, and magnifies the risk to Israel’s long-term safety and security by increasing dangerous regional instability.  Moreover, the overwhelming majority of American Jews, along with most American Jewish organizations across the spectrum—from AIPAC to J-Street—all support a two-state solution,” he added.

Locally, those who did not return phone calls or e-mails with their views on the appointment include Palestinian-American leader Linda Sarsour, a vocal pro-Palestinian rights supporter who is reportedly eyeing a run for the vacant City Council seat in Bay Ridge, and City Councilman David Greenfield, one of the more vocal supporters of Israel.

But Borough Park Assemblyman Dov Hikind who, like Friedman, calls the West Bank the biblical names of Judea and Sumeria, said he is thrilled with Friedman and everything he represents.

“Everyone wants peace [in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict], but to work out peace you must have a partner to make peace. Right now, there is no partner for peace. You have to realize 40 percent of the Palestinians are ruled by Hamas in Gaza and they are a terrorist organization. Their honest goal is the destruction of Israel,” said Hikind, adding Donald Trump is now the President-elect and he has a right to choose whomever he wants as ambassadors.

Countering that are the views of City Council members Brad Lander and Stephen Levin – members of both the City Council Progressive and Jewish Caucus. A Lander spokesperson referred the council member’s views on Friedman’s appointment to the very Trump-like answer of referring to his Tweets on the subject.

“Trump’s appointment of David Friedman is bad for Israel, for Palestinians, for American Jews and for the U.S.,” Lander stated in one Tweet.

Friedman is a nasty tribalist who has called Barack Obama an “anti-Semite”, and Jews like me “far worse than kapos,” Lander said in another Tweet.

Levin said he’s very concerned about Friedman’s appointment.

“I’m a big supporter of J-Street and have worked with J-Street and I’m very concerned with reports of his vilification of J-Street and Jewish-Americans that support the two-state solution,” said Levin. “I’ve been dedicated to a two-state solution my entire adult life. The only way we’re going to see peace in any of our lifetimes is through an affirmation of a national movement of both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples. I agree with the current (Obama) Administration that peace won’t come through the expansion of settlements beyond the Green Line and that settlements are an obstacle to peace. So I find the appointment very unsettling.”

– Kelly Mena contributed to this story

Disclosure:  Stephen Witt is a Jewish-American supporter of Israel who was born in Chicago and raised in Skokie, Illinois, which at one time had the largest settlement of Holocaust survivors in the United States. 

North Carolina Republicans’ Legislative Coup is an Attack on Democracy

And a Preview of Voter Suppression to Come

By Mark Joseph Stern, Slate.com

Republicans in the North Carolina General Assembly staged a shocking legislative coup on Wednesday night, calling a second special session and proposing a raft of measures designed to strip power from the newly progressive state Supreme Court and governorship. This last-minute power grab marks an alarming departure from basic democratic norms—a blatant attempt to overturn the results of an election by curtailing judicial independence and restructuring the government to seize authority lawfully delegated to the incoming Democratic governor.

The trouble in North Carolina began when Republican Gov. Pat McCrory lost his re-election bid, likely because of his support for the anti-LGBTQ law known as HB2. At the same time that voters replaced McCrory with Democrat Roy Cooper, they ousted a conservative state Supreme Court justice in favor of a progressive. That tilted the balance of power on the court to a 4–3 liberal majority, ending an era in which the court’s conservatives could rubber stamp the legislature’s voter suppression and gerrymandering.

Because of this gerrymandering, Republicans retained a supermajority in the state legislature, even while losing the governorship and Supreme Court. (A federal court ordered the legislature to redraw its maps and hold new elections, but those won’t occur until 2017.) Rumors floated around the capital that Republican legislators would either throw out the results of the gubernatorial election and reinstall McCrory by citing baseless allegations of election fraud or add two seats to the Supreme Court and let McCrory fill them, restoring Republican control. McCrory eventually conceded defeat when a partial recount could not close his 10,000 vote deficit. But concerns over court-packing grew when McCrory called a special legislative session, ostensibly to pass a disaster relief package.

To read more:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/12/15/north_carolina_legislative_coup_an_attack_on_democracy.html

A.G. Schneiderman Call on Obama to Dismantle Federal Registry Targeting Muslims

If Left In Place, NSEERS Framework Could Serve As Blueprint For Future Registry Of Muslims Nationwide

NEW YORK – Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today called on the Obama Administration to rescind the regulatory framework of the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS), a controversial registry created during the George W. Bush era that sought to track and register non-immigrant males from primarily Arab, Muslim, and South Asian countries regardless of whether they were suspected or accused of any wrongdoing.

Created in the wake of September 11, 2001, NSEERS targeted boys and men primarily from Muslim-majority countries. After the program proved to be ineffective at reducing terrorist activity, new registration in the program was terminated by the Department of Homeland Security in 2011. However, the regulatory framework undergirding the program remains in place, creating an unacceptable temptation for future administrations to restart the program.

The registry has not proven to provide any law enforcement benefit whatsoever. Rather, the NSEERS regulatory framework currently serves only as a dormant reminder of a misguided and discriminatory policy. NSEERS undermined trust and hindered open communications between law enforcement and community members, thus hampering the ability of law enforcement to promote public safety.

“America is a nation built by immigrants and the NSEERS program is an affront to our core American values of pluralism and equal justice under law,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “We can’t risk giving President-elect Trump the tools to create an unconstitutional religious registry. We can never allow our nation to return to the dark days of Japanese internment. By finally dismantling the NSEERS program now, President Obama can make a repeat of that horror significantly more difficult.”

The “call-in registration” portion of NSEERS targeted males from 25 primarily Arab, Muslim-majority, African, and South Asian countries, as well as North Korea and Eritrea, and required them to appear at local immigration offices for fingerprinting and interrogations.

Despite registering more than 80,000 teenage boys and men, NSEERS failed to result in a single terrorism-related conviction. More than 13,000 men who registered with NSEERS were placed in removal proceedings, leaving their families and communities devastated.

By facilitating the government’s ability to single out individuals for special registration, the NSEERS framework echoes policies that many Americans, including law enforcement officers, have disavowed.

Coaches Corner

71

(photos by Nathaniel Adams)

Girls Varsity Basketball 12/12/2016

Harry Van Arsdale Educational Campus – 31

Paul Robeson Campus High School – 63

Harry Van Arsdale Head Coach Johnathan Beckman:

KEISY VILLANUEVA, Sophmore

“We came out to a good start to the game. They tried to throw a punch at us right away, we took the lead by 6 and they caught up to us by the half. We knew they were going to come out firing and we didn’t respond, they came out throwing haymakers, we just couldn’t respond.”

Paul Robeson Volunteer Assistant Phinnigan Edwards: “The game was kind of sloppy at first. We just

PHINNETTE EDWARDS, Freshmen

came back from Washington, DC playing a tournament Saturday and Sunday, so I think the girls’ legs were weak. But I think we finished up strong. I love our defense, our team is built around defense. I think they did their job on defense. Good defense, shooting skills and being able to keep the ball in play kept the team from losing the game.”