Medgar Evers College of the City University of New York (CUNY) was named after a slain civil rights hero and Black leader who spent his life fighting for the rights of all people to be included in the economic, social, political and educational mainstream of American society without bias or prejudice. The college that bears his name was founded to provide higher educational opportunities to the underserved urban populations of Central Brooklyn and beyond. Since its inception, Medgar Evers College (MEC) has been true to that mission. One of the ways it fulfills its mission is in the creation of centers within the college, which concentrate on specific population groups or academic disciplines: for example: the Center for Women’s Development or the Center for Black Literature.
One of the centers at MEC, the six-year-old Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions, has been singled out for attack, severe criticism and special treatment. Ironically, and perhaps coincidentally, this center focuses on the population of students who have been formerly incarcerated but are now seeking to turn their lives around through the acquisition of a college education. For the past several weeks, there has been a continuing controversy between the Center for NuLeadership and the college’s newly appointed senior management staff, led by President William L. Pollard, Vice President Lloyd Blanchard and Provost Howard L. Johnson, over the legitimacy of the Center for NuLeadership and its funding. President Pollard referenced these issues in the July 8th issue of Our Time Press. It is imperative that we clarify and provide background information on these issues.
In “Summer News from Medgar Evers College,” Dr. Pollard writes about a funding grant proposal submitted by the Center for NuLeadership in January and the fact that “Provost Johnson received the [funding] proposal in May 2010 and raised in writing a series of questions reflecting the college’s legitimate concerns.” To be clear, there was no grant proposal submitted in January. The Center for NuLeadership was solicited by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services to begin a series of negotiations on a Court 2 College grant that would provide formerly incarcerated people with an opportunity to attend college. The proposal to which President Pollard is referring, is a draft proposal and the Center for NuLeadership attempted to meet with the president for several months to discuss the proposal. Furthermore, the Center for NuLeadership was provided with the provost’s questions related to the proposal on the same day that President Pollard sent a message re: nonresponse to questions on the proposal to the college community.
The college’s senior management team has used the request for authorization of the proposal as a basis for questioning the legitimacy and status of the Center for NuLeadership. The funding proposal has nothing to do with our application to be approved as a center. By mixing the two, the president has given the impression that the Center for NuLeadership is unwilling to cooperate with the provost. Nothing is further from the truth.
In April 2009, at the request of MEC’s former president, Dr. Edison O. Jackson, the Center for NuLeadership – with the assistance of the college’s legal counsel – submitted a formal written proposal to be recognized as a center within the college. The proposal was presented to the Medgar Evers College Council, the highest governing body within the college, and approved by a unanimous vote. The College Council instructed the former Provost to forward the proposal, with their recommendation for approval, to the CUNY Office of Academic Affairs, for final ratification by the CUNY Board of Trustees. This was never done. Provost Johnson, with the approval of senior management, has still refused to forward the approved proposal. Instead, he has drafted a series of questions and demanded that the Center for NuLeadership answer them before he forwards the proposal.
Simply put, the provost has decided to supersede the authority of the College Council and CUNY Central by disregarding the established CUNY guidelines for the establishment of centers and creating his own prerequisites for approval. The Center for NuLeadership has no objection to answering the provost’s questions, and will. However, it firmly maintains that the proposal should not be subjected to any additional prerequisites or requirements not asked of other centers, nor should its application be held hostage pending answers to these additional requirements. The College Council, not the provost, is the governing body of the college. It has already voted approval of the proposal. The provost cannot now impose further requirements and ignore the College Council’s mandate.
For over six years, the Center for NuLeadership has operated at Medgar Evers College with absolutely no problems. We were assigned an account with the Research Foundation of the City University of New York (RF), in the name of the Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions, for purposes of funding, payroll and other expenses. We have received extensive funding opportunities for the college and have always been self-sufficient in covering the costs of our staff, operations and programs. There has never been any question or issue with any of our grant proposals. We have always followed CUNY rules and regulations to the letter and have always complied with any and all of the “legitimate concerns” of the college to secure approval for these funds.
While the controversy focuses on the Center for NuLeadership, its outcome has broad implications for all of the Centers in the college and for the relationship between the College and the Central Brooklyn community. The centers were established to serve both the College and Central Brooklyn Community. When the college interferes with the governance and programmatic issues of the centers, this negatively impacts the community. Will the new managers of the college adhere to and respect the rules governing the college or will they continue to attempt to create their own rules, or change the college’s rules when those rules do not suit their purposes?
Based upon our six-year history at Medgar Evers, there are no reasons why the Center for NuLeadership’s proposal should not be sent to the CUNY Office of Academic Affairs immediately. There are no prerequisites involved. Sending our proposal to CUNY does not require approval of anyone at the college beyond the approvals already secured. Finally, there are no reasons why the president and the provost should not welcome the work that the Center for NuLeadership is doing as opposed to trying to curtail it.
Dr. Divine Pryor, Executive Director
Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions
Mr. Eddie Ellis, Deputy Director
Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions
For the Sake of Truth and Clarity NuLeadership Responds to President Pollard’s Message
A Year Later — Family and Friends Remember Shem Walker During Emotional Candlelight Vigil
Shavon Walker, Daughter
One year ago today, the person who I saw as my hero, my Savior, other than Jesus Christ, was killed right here. Only my family can feel the pain that we feel every day walking back and forth. From a place that was supposed to be a sanctuary. But it’s not the same. The person who took my father’s life is still living his life day-to-day. Going home to his family. Smiling and laughing. And he doesn’t feel the pain that we feel on a daily basis.
The sentimental things, the laughter. The jokiness. Just the kind person that he was, we no longer have. Is it fair? I think not.
Do we need justice? Absolutely. Will this justice system fail us? We shall see. It is up to us as a community to rise above this and take a stand that this will not happen to anyone again.
I’m making a plea right now, to those in the neighborhood. This step needs to be precious. To hang out on the step, which is the reason why my father got into a scuffle, is wrong. I’m just asking that there should be no trespassing, period. That’s a plea, a personal plea from me. I come here, I pass here so many times, and when I pass here and I see people standing here and I say “It’s happening again.”
If my dad was here he would tell you to come off the stairs. Why is it still happening? A life was taken from us and we’re still having the same perpetuating behavior.
Today, I’m making a plea to the community: We must all stick together and take a lesson from what happened here at 370 Lafayette Avenue, July 11th, last year.
My father is gone from us, but he is still not forgotten. We have two lovely new additions to our family and we’re blessed. God took one away from us but he brought us back two. We’re living through them, thank you.
Mrs. Walker, Mother
“I was Shem’s mother. Last year on the 11th, a Saturday evening, Shem went to the fast-food store and he bought me some food. He came in and give me the food, but something wasn’t right. So I said, ‘Shem, I can’t eat this food, you take it.’ He emptied my bowl into his plate and went into the kitchen and ate. When he finished he went outside and he had a piece of cake. He put the piece in my mouth and he said, ‘Mommy, I’m going to get a smoke.’
“The next time I saw my son there he is in a casket. Died. What for? They say he went to the store and he came back and he sees somebody sitting on the steps. Don’t mind how abrupt he said to the man, ‘Get off!’ or ‘Move!’ How come my son ends up dead? You mean to tell me two trained police, one on this step and one on the next step. They couldn’t subdue one innocent, unarmed man without using gun force? I don’t think this is it. I just don’t think that is right. So all I’m asking for now is for justice. The man who killed my son, and it was like he killed me. My sight has gone since then. All I’m asking for now is justice for my son. Justice for Shem.”
Reverend Michael Bacchus, Full Gospel Assembly
What I know of Shem, he’d come from Pennsylvania on weekends, get his mother on Sunday mornings and bring her to church. He’d bring his car up on the sidewalk, take his mom out of the car and put her in the wheelchair, get her into the church, get on the elevator, bring her up into the sanctuary and she sits right in the back. When church is finished, Shem comes back again, gets his mom in the reverse order and brings his mother home. I don’t know all the other pieces, but I can say I saw that this was a son who was very loving, very caring and very dutiful for his mom. And I believe that’s a golden heart that he took the time to be there for his mother, in the house of the Lord, week after week. I want to honor the family, especially the young man who is currently bringing his grandmother, Sunday after Sunday, he brings her to church. That’s the same thing that Shem was doing.
Councilwoman Letitia
The Walker family is pursuing a civil action, but the District Attorney should at least reach out to the family and explain where things are at this time. Whether or not there is an active investigation. Or whether it’s closed, and if closed, why? I think they are owed that reason and that explanation. A year without justice for Shem Walker is really unfortunate. And without any interaction with the District Attorney’s office, I just believe this family deserves better.
If you’re selling drugs, you are the enemy. You’re tearing our community apart. Families have been torn apart by drugs. It’s because individuals sold drugs on this corner and at that corner at Classon Avenue, Shem is not here. We want a community where our mothers and grandmothers are safe and where children can play without worrying about drug dealers. Let this message be the message we take away from the life of Shem Walker. That’s the message here today. Justice for this family, but also at the same time (community), we have got to stand up and do the right thing.
Lydia Phillips, Aunt
It’s been one year now since that cop shot my nephew on these same steps. They said they were undercover. The guy was sitting on the steps and my nephew told him no loitering here and told him to get up. His partner came up the steps and told my nephew he couldn’t tell the guy who was sitting on the steps to move. My nephew told him there was no loitering and he took his gun out and shot my nephew twice in the chest and in the forehead. This is a family building. My niece came out. And if someone comes out and says this is my brother, they still took him to the hospital as a John Doe.
Since then, there has been nothing. The case has not gone to a grand jury or anything like that. One year. Nothing has happened. All they’re saying is that they’re investigating.