Home Blog Page 858

Dr. Amos Wilson: Why We Do The Things We Do

(In 1998, Our Time Press ran a three-part series on Post-Traumatic Slavery Syndrome, taking the title from the lecture of Professor Joy Leary at St. Paul Community Baptist Church MAAFA lectures.

Part three of the series came from a lecture at Brooklyn’s Slave Theater in 1995 given by the late Dr. Amos N. Wilson, assistant professor of Psychology at the City University of New York. )

 

 

By Dr. Amos N. Wilson

 

Dr. Amos Wilson

Power is not Sinful

We’re going to talk about African-centered consciousness, personality and culture as instruments of power. Because, ultimately, this is what this whole struggle is about: Power. To a great extent, the problems that we are confronted with today as African people and African people in America flows from our powerlessness, or our inappropriate use of power. We’ve been made to think that power is sinful, and that to pursue it is a sinful pursuit.

But you cannot exist without power. Without power there is no life. You need power to act, to behave in the world. And consequently then, we must interpret what we are about in terms of power. And we have the power, ladies and gentlemen. We have the possibilities. We just need to reorganize ourselves. We need to organize our consciousness and our personalities and our culture and see them as instruments of power, and use them as instruments of power to transform our situation. So do not look at consciousness as some abstraction.

 

Organize Your World, Get a Good Theory

As I often tell people, the most practical thing you can have is a good theory, a good concept to guide your behavior. As an instrument to measure and test reality. A good theory organizes the world and organizes one’s approach to the world and permits one to be able to evaluate the world in terms of where one wants to go and what one wants to do. To be without theory then is to approach the world on an ad hoc basis. Always reacting to what other people are doing.

Always being overwhelmed by events and overwhelmed by the future. Instead of creating events and creating the future and making the future. With a good theory and a good concept, one is able to do that.

 

Your Consciousness Creates Your World

It is the presence of human consciousness that brings meaning into the world.  And through our consciousness, we create the world we live in. In other words, the kind of world you exist in reflects the kind of consciousness that you have.

And notice if you change your consciousness or change your values and orientation, you enter into a different world. You interact with different people. Social situations that you might not have even recognized until you entered into a new level of consciousness. For instance, you see people who become addicted to crack or something, entering into a whole world and social system that before they became addicted, they hardly noticed. They picked up new friends, new relations and whole new ways of acting. New purposes in life. They lost old friends, broke with old families. In other words, the addictive consciousness brought into the world a new foreground and put other things into the background. Therefore, man’s consciousness is a creative act, and the kind of consciousness you have will determine the kind of world you create.

Consequently, when you look at the world we live in as African people, we must recognize to a great extent it is not a world of our own creation. It is a world that has been created by the kind of consciousness we have permitted to be instilled in us as a people.

 

The Power is in Our Hands

We talk about the white man as having power. I want you to recognize that power

ultimately has to do with the relationship between people. And that the white man’s so-called power is to a great extent based upon the nature of the relationship he has with the black man. We empower him by the nature of our own behavior and attitudes as a people. He cannot be what he is unless we are what we are. To a good extent, the European is our creation. If we look at our behavior, we will see that to a good extent it is that behavior; our values, our consciousness, the kinds of personalities we’ve established in ourselves, our tastes, our desires and needs that maintains the European in this position.

We talk about the civil rights movement. And the apartheid system of the South.

When blacks decided just to get out of the buses and walk, the system changed. When they just stopped sitting in the back. Just changing that relationship changed the nature of power in that system.

When they kept their monies in their pockets, when they sat on those stools and blocked the other people from them, and changed the nature of the interaction between themselves and Europeans, the nature of the system changed. So, therefore, we have tremendous power; it depends upon how we align ourselves as a people and how we decide to relate to other people in the world, because they cannot have what they have unless we are who we are. That is why we don’t have to spend a great deal of time always appealing to them, and analyzing them, because we can better appeal to our own sense of self and our own consciousness.

We waste a lot of time trying to transform them, when by transforming ourselves, they will be transformed automatically. The power is in our hands. We are not destined to be the servants of white folks. That is not the destiny of black folk.

 

Education for What Purpose

Many of us go to these schools to become “qualified” to work for whom? To work for them. Why do we assume that they’re going to have jobs for us? These people are having difficulty making jobs for themselves. The greatest challenge that the European economies are facing today is that they are not generating enough jobs for their own people.

And even though America is bragging about the millions of jobs it’s creating, those jobs are part-time jobs, low-wage jobs and jobs that have little or no future. So when people talk about creating jobs, you have to ask what kinds of jobs are being created. That’s why the system is not investing in black education. It no longer needs black people to maintain its employment structure.

You see it bringing in people from outside the nation to be employed. You see it even is hiring in other nations and other places. Already, it has reached the point where its need for black males is pretty much saturated, and it literally is warehousing us in jails and prisons, and provoking us to kill each other and to destroy each other out here in these streets.

 

We Create Jobs

And yet, we are still organizing the education of our children as though the white man has jobs waiting for them in multitudes. How different our education would be if we sent our children to school to create jobs for themselves. To create their own economic and political systems. To see themselves as the major sources of their employment. I heard something about some people … protesting for jobs and pushing these other people for jobs, and I asked the question. Do we know how many jobs we create for other people? We are a job-creating people. We don’t realize it because we don’t think in terms of nation. If we saw ourselves as a nation, we could see that we create jobs like any other nation.

How many jobs are created by black music? Look at the whole structure of the music industry. From promoters to the manufacturers of the records and the tapes, to the whole entertainment field, to the sellers of music in the stores, the Tower Records and the other great sellers of records and music and the advertising that uses our music, etc. How many thousands of jobs are we creating as a people? We’re creating them, but they have them. We sing the music, they sell it. We sing the music, they market it. We sing the music, they promote it.

We sing the music; they produce great conglomerates like Sony, CBS Music, creating all kinds of jobs. We create tremendous jobs for a lot of people. How many jobs do we create just buying from Koreans? Buying from other ethnic groups. How many people are we creating employment for in terms of our spending habits as a people and our consumption habits as a people? How many jobs are we creating going to jail? We’re creating all kinds of jobs and wealth, and we must come to understand this.

We are creating these jobs, and yet we are begging for jobs. This means that somewhere our consciousness has been impaired. We’re begging for what we are making already. And we cannot use our own creations as a source of our own wealth.

 

Wealth is in the Mind

The Creator could not have intended for us as African people to be a poor people if the Creator implanted in our soils all the wealth that was planted there. We talk about the minerals and the oil, and the gold and more that have been planted in African soils, so the Creator has blessed us from the very beginning with wealth and possibility. Therefore, for us to be going hungry over this wealth and to be starving in the midst of it, and to be perceived as a dependent, indebted people, while our wealth is being shipped out to other people, we’re actually selling a lot of it for pennies, nickels and dimes and less–means that there is something wrong with our consciousness. Because ultimately, we’ve said the wealth of a people is not in their land, it’s in the mind. The wealth of man is in his mind. In his consciousness. We look at the example of Japan. No mineral wealth to speak of whatsoever. Nothing at all. A  nation that is totally dependent. Of course, we get things backward don’t we? We see ourselves as depending on Europeans when the reality is the other way around. They depend on us. We have to be backwards in order for this situation to be the way it is. Our reality has to be turned backwards and we have to live in an almost permanent state of deception in order to be used in the way we are used. The Japanese must depend on others for their vital resources, their oil, their timber. All of these things that they use to create their technology and so forth is taken from the soils of other people and then sold back to them.

And yet they are seen as rich and powerful, and the people’s whose wealth they take or buy are seen as poor and poverty-stricken.

 

Our Mentality Must be Impoverished

Ultimately, you cannot rob or take from a poor people. You cannot get wealth from a poverty-stricken people. So if you’re getting all your diamonds, gold, magnesium and all the rest from African people, then African people must be wealthy and rich. Therefore, if African people are poverty-stricken with this material wealth, then it must be because our consciousness as a people is impoverished and we are suffering an impoverishment of our mentality. If you have a good mind, you can con another joker out of his land. You can con him out of his diamonds and his gold, and this is what the other people have done. They have used their mind and their cleverness and taken from us what they did not have originally. Therefore, consciousness is not an abstract concept. It is not a theoretical concept; it is a concept that is directly related to the reality one lives in. It is directly related to the type of life that one will live. So I’m going to look at this for a minute. Particularly, the consciousness of Africans in America.

 

Why Do You Talk About Slavery?

I’m often somewhat amused and taken aback by the number of people in this society who claim that slavery occurred somewhere back then…and that the experience of slavery is not supposed to be operating in the mentality of black folks. You hear a lot of youngsters saying that as well. “Why do you talk about slavery? That was back there.”

Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve never escaped slavery. We still share the slave consciousness of our great-great-grandparents. We are of the same mind to a great extent that they were. We have not advanced beyond these people. How can I say that? I generally ask a series of questions. You say that slavery has nothing to do with you and that slavery was back there. I ask you what language do you speak? When did you learn that language? Was that the language African people were speaking when we were taken into slavery in America? In other words, the language we speak at this moment is a slave language. The language that our slave ancestors were forced to learn. And we still speak it and you can still hear the pidgin, the Creole and the other kinds of stuff in our language right now. That language, with its words defined by history and by experience, is the language we use today to guide our behavior. It’s the language we use today to talk to ourselves. It’s the language we use today to learn about ourselves and to learn about the world. It’s the language we use to try to understand ourselves. Is there no wonder then that we are still confused? So we have not escaped slavery because we are still using a slave language, and we speak the language of slaves.

What kind of food do you eat? You say, “soul food”? Was that the food of African  people? Slave food. The food that we find most satisfying. The food that we find that sticks to our ribs. The food that we call “down home”. A food that we learned to eat in the quarters. And yet we dare say that we have escaped slavery. That we have nothing to do with those people back there. When our whole very social life and social relationships, our very definition of ourselves as a people, our very attempt to commune with ourselves is mediated by the food of slaves. How can you say you exist in a different consciousness from another people? What kind of uniforms are we wearing? What kind of clothes are we wearing? Were these the clothes of African people? This is what we’ve got to look at. What kind of names do we respond to? What kind of names do we identify with? Why is it that African names sound strange to us now as a people? And yet we dare say we have a different consciousness from our great-grandparents. How can we say that? We are still in the same consciousness and we are still in the same position. Because we are still servants of the white man, and our reason for being in America is to serve white folks and to generate wealth for them. And there has been no change at all in terms of our relationship to these people.

 

Time to Change the Consciousness

The values that we pursue are slave values and the values of servants. The social relations that we create and interact with were built and developed during the period of slavery. We have not escaped it at all. But it is time for us to change the slave consciousness. This consciousness of servitude that is still too much with us today. And ultimately, we ask the question that is closest to home for a lot of people. When we claim that we have escaped slavery and that slavery was something back there, which has nothing to do with us today, and then I ask you the question, “What kind of God do you worship?”

What’s the name of Him? Who taught you to praise Him? Was this the God you were praying to before you were brought to these shores? Is this the religion you had before you were brought to these shores? Can you name one African God? How can you then define yourself, the very essence of yourself, and the very essence of your soul and organize the very nature of your life here on earth based on a God handed to us by our slave masters and claim that you have no slave consciousness and are not related to slavery? In other words then ladies and gentlemen, we are not Africans. We are possessed by spirits and demons. We have let another people’s spirit take possession of our bodies and take possession of our minds.

When we speak it is not with our African voice, it is with the voice of the demonic presence that uses our lips to speak its own language. We have to recognize this. We are possessed. If we are to transform ourselves and transform the nature of our relationship with those who are our masters, we must engage in an exorcism and clear the devils out of our minds.

 

Literature of Possession

At this time, it would pay you to read a little bit about demonic possession. And you have to be demonically possessed, because if we talk about black-on-black violence, self-defeating behavior, self-destructive behavior, then we could not be possessed by a beautiful and wonderful God. We must be possessed by a demon.

It’s interesting to look at the literature of possession. There are several types of possession. One is called a somnambulistic possession. “Soma” having to do with sleep, “ambulistic”, to move around, ambulatory. So we’re talking about people who are sleepwalking. Not awake but they’re walking around. The body is moving and it is walking in an organized fashion, and walking systematically, but the person is still asleep. And in somnambulistic possession then, the individual’s original self has been repressed and displaced and he identifies with the spirit that possesses him. And his eye and the spirit’s eye are one and the same.

 

In Defending our Ego, We Destroy Ourselves

We have a lot of that today, where the spirit has been implanted in us and we have taken to be us. We’ve identified with it. That is why in defending ourselves we end up defending the people who rule over us. In defending our ego, we end up maintaining the social structure that has destroyed our ego to begin with. And you see it in our youngsters who will fight and kill in the name of respect. And fight because their ego-orientation has been insulted. And therefore in defending their ego, they do not kill the people who destroyed their ego, they kill each other and maintain the ones who destroyed them in the first place, in power. That’s why the subtitle of my book, Black-on-Black Violence was Black Self-Annihilation in Service of White Domination. We are killing each other in order to maintain this system. We have let ourselves become possessed by a spirit, such that when we become aggressive, we aggress against the self, instead of those who are the source of our aggressive orientation.

 

Black Self-Hatred is White Man’s Self-Defense

We talk a lot as a people about self-hatred. Self-hatred is a personality configuration. It is an orientation toward the world and toward oneself.

Self-hatred then, is the white man’s greatest protection against being destroyed by the black man. To a good extent, self-hatred is the white man’s self-defense mechanism. How can we say that? Well, one function of the personality is to direct energy. To channel aggression and energy and wishes and impulses in particular directions.

Those things that we hate, when we are angry or hostile, we aggress against them, don’t we? We attack them, we destroy them. Then we have a problem, don’t we? If we attack the things we hate, if we attack the things towards which we hold hostility when we are overly frustrated and when we are angry, then what happens if that thing we hate is ourselves?  It means then, ladies and gentlemen, when we become frustrated and angered as a people, when we are overwrought by feelings of hostility, and our self-hating personality seeks to channel that hostility, and channel that aggression, it’s going to channel that aggression right back on the self. Because that’s the thing we hate most.

So consequently, black anger then becomes a conduit for black self-destruction. For black self-defeat. The object of our hostile, aggressive feelings becomes ourselves. And you can see then how the white man is protected by that personality structure. While he stokes our anger, while he stokes our hostility, while he stokes our frustration, and while we get mad and want to strike out, when we decide to strike out and aggress, we strike out and aggress against the self. And by doing so, he is left untouched and unscathed. Therefore, our self-hatred becomes his principle means of defending himself and maintaining himself.

 

Colin Ferguson was a Scare

One of the things that frightened him most about the Colin Ferguson case (the man who went on a shooting rampage on the Long Island Railroad) was that Ferguson’s self-hatred mechanism broke down. Unlike many deaf, dumb and blind Negroes, he knew who his enemies were. And so when he got angry and hostile, instead of going out to drink himself to death, instead of going out to smoke crack and destroy himself, instead of going out and killing someone who looked like himself, instead of going out to commit suicide and put himself in a place to be destroyed by somebody else, he went directly to the source of his frustration. This is what frightened those people. They were wondering how many more are there like that, and are they increasing. So you can see why the seed of self-hatred is planted in the minds of the black man.

 

Who Benefits from the Black Man’s Aberrations

We spend a lot of time about what it does to us, but we’ve got to also look at how every maladaptive characteristics in the black psyche is there for white folks. It’s not there because they hate you, or misunderstand you. It has nothing to do with all of that. I tell people when you analyze the so-called aberrations in the black personality you must always ask the question, “What are their social functions and roles?” Who benefits from this aberration in the black man’s mind? What is the social, political and economic benefit, and for whom?

Who gains from this particular orientation in our minds? Then you begin to see why it’s there and what its function is. So every complaint we have about ourselves has a political, economic and social intent beneficial to white folk and detrimental to ourselves.

That means then somewhere along the way we became possessed by these orientations. And they were implanted on our personalities. We have come to identify with them as our natural selves, as our natural orientations. We have assumed that they represent who we are. And we have now found many ingenious ways to defend the demons that possess us. Ultimately then, those demons destroy us and have us destroy others like ourselves.

 

A Change of Consciousness Goes to the Bone

The bodies that we have tonight, ladies and gentlemen, are bodies that have been created by the European experience, and are not our natural bodies as African people. Just as the surface of our bodies reflect the influence of another people, the very internal nature and the physiology of our bodies reflect those people as well. That’s why when you get rid of them, you’re going to have a healing experience. And your whole body will change. I’ve read some of this before, but let me read it again, I think in this context. This is most dramatic when we study the so-called multiple personality, and let me read you a description here that was printed in the Times. It begins, “When Timmy drinks orange juice he has no problem. But Timmy is just one of close to one dozen personalities who alternate control over a patient with multiple personality disorder. And if those other personalities drink orange juice, the result is a case of hives”.

What are we saying here? We’ve got one body, but depending on what consciousness possesses that body, that body will react to the drinking of orange juice, with or without hives. It will break out in blisters. So, if it drinks orange juice when one of the other personalities are possessing it, welts and hives will break out right there. If Timmy comes back, if the new consciousness comes back, and takes over that body, the hives will disappear almost on the moment. In other words, there is a different body for a different consciousness. It goes on to say that “medical disorders are found to differ from one sub-personality to another”. In other words, even though these so-called personalities possess the same so-called body, each personality has a different order of illnesses associated with it. Each personality is vulnerable to a particular type of ailment, one way or the other. So, what are we talking about? We’re saying that each consciousness that is represented by each personality creates its own body, creates its own physiology, and thereby creates its own vulnerability to various ailments and so forth. You see, you get people in medical school who try to teach you that disease only occurs as a result of some kind of viral syndrome, or some kind of entity into the body of some bacteria, and certainly that is a part of it, and certainly there is reality there. But the body must interact with the viruses, and must interact with the diseased entity, and this is what we talk about when we talk about the immune system, that health is not necessarily the absence of the disease, but the capacity of the body to resist the disease, to stand up against the disease.

And so, consequently, when these bodies are taken over by different personalities, these personalities apparently change the nature of the immune system of those bodies, making them vulnerable to diseases when one personality is present and not so when another is present. Which means ladies and gentlemen, that the nature of the consciousness which possesses us as persons, will, to a degree, determine the illnesses to which we are vulnerable as a person and as people. And a lot of the illnesses, physical and other diseases that we suffer within, are mediated by the nature of the consciousness that we’ve permitted to possess us as a people. To a great extent, the defeat of disease, the maintaining of health, must not only be pursued in terms of discovering new drugs and these kinds of things, but must involve self-discovery and self-knowledge. It goes on to state that “in people with multiple personalities, there is a strong psychological separation between each sub-personality. Each will have his own name and age.” Does that strike a bell? What did we say earlier? To what names do we respond? Are they the same names to which we responded prior to slavery? So in other words, as we got the new slave personality, we got what? New names. And we were changed.

 

Our Names Marked New Consciousness

To a good extent, our names were given to us to designate our new consciousness and our new situation. “Each will have his own name and age, and often some specific memories and abilities.” In other words, each personality has his own history, has his own biography and has his own memory. And you look at Negroes when they have a certain consciousness and look at the history they remember.

Look at the things that they keep in their memories and look at the histories they study and identify with. Look at them fight African history.  Yes they do.  Look at them want to identify with the history of Europeans. Look at them wanting to define themselves in terms of that history and look at them having memories only for that history. Look at those Africans who are still under the possessive influence of the European implanted spirit, and note that they have little or no knowledge of African history. And therefore, little or no knowledge of their own history as a person and an individual.

So there is a consistency between the consciousness and the history that a person has and the memory that an individual has. “Frequently, personalities differ in handwriting, artistic talent or even in knowledge of foreign languages. Multiple personalities typically develop in people who were severely and repeatedly abused as children. Apparently as a means to protect themselves against the pain of abuse.” Does that strike another note in you? “Often, only one or two of the sub-personalities will be conscious of the abuse, while the others will have no memory or experience of the pain.”

 

Trying to Escape the Memory of Slave Experience

To a great extent, the personality of the African-American today has been shaped by our desires to escape the memory of the slave experience, to deny its existence. We don’t want to talk about it. We don’t want to come to terms with it. We don’t want to re-experience it psychologically. And therefore, our lives become defined by eternal escape and avoidance of reality and of history and of knowledge of who we are and how we came to be who and what we are. And consequently, we cannot act upon the reality of our history and we therefore guide our behavior and define ourselves in terms of a fantasy as history, and a misinterpretation of reality….

Think about the African and the world the African lived in prior to being brought across the oceans. Think about the gods we praised. Think about the organization of our societies. Think about the languages we spoke, the food we ate, the dress we wore, the music, the songs, the dance, and all of those things that defined us as African people. And think how horrendous it must have been for us to be thrown in this world, where there was a whole new language, a whole new social hierarchy, a whole new set of authorities, people pushing you around who you don’t understand, people who are putting strange tools in your hands, people who are trying to get you to relate to them and to relate to each other in a very different kind of way than what you are used to. Think about the stress and the confusion, and think about the abuse. Think about the horror of that situation that our parents and great-grandparents were put in. And there was somebody that said then, “If you pray to this god, if you talk this way, if you dress this way, if you relate this way, you’ll get a greater sense of security. Your anxiety will be reduced. You will feel good, and you’ll be able to withstand the pain of your existence. And the god that I’m going to hand you is one that I have created for you, and the theology that comes with it is one that I have created so that you will continue to serve me as you continue to serve it.” And we come to believe in the veracity and the God of that religion. Why? Because we feel so secure when we follow it, and we feel so relieved when we follow it. And yet we wonder why, despite all of our prayers, despite all of our devotion, we still suffer the way we do.

 

A Reorientation to Religion is Needed

I often ask the question, “Why is it that the people who pray the most have the most children in the jails of America today?  Those who shout and kicks over the benches and so forth are filling up the prisons and have the children killing each other and addicted out here in these streets?” There must be a problem here ladies and gentlemen. We must reorient ourselves to our religion. We must reorient ourselves to our gods, because apparently we don’t have the appropriate orientation. As that book you read says, you can tell a tree by the fruit it bears, and therefore if it bears bitter fruit, or if it bears no fruit at all, the god you worship says it is but fit to be hewn down and thrown into the flame and consumed. Read your own Bible. It gives you a very practical measure as to whether the religion you are pursuing is an appropriate one.

(Dr. Wilson authored: The Developmental Psychology of the Black Child, Black-on-Black Violence: the Psychodynamics of Black Self-Annihilation in Service of White Domination, Awakening the Natural Genius of Black Children,  Blueprint for Black Power and more. Following is text from Wilson’s lecture.  The foregoing are excerpts from an historic lecture delivered by Dr. Amos N. Wilson at the Slave Theater in Brooklyn, NY. The lecture in its entirety appears in, “Afrikan-Centered Consciousness Versus The New World Order: Garveyism in the Age of Globalism.” For more information, call Afrikan World Infosystems 718 462-1830.)

BP ADAMS RELEASES REPORT ANALYZING IMPACT OF 2004 REZONING OF DOWNTOWN BROOKLYN

TO ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT IMBALANCE, BOROUGH PRESIDENT CALLS FOR REINVESTMENT IN CORE INFRASTRUCTURE, EXPANSION OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Aerials over Downtown Brooklyn

BROOKLYN, NY, February 22, 2016: Today, Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams released “A Decade Later in Downtown Brooklyn”, a report analyzing the impact of the Downtown Brooklyn Plan, a rezoning initiated in 2004 by the Bloomberg Administration. The analysis, which can be accessed at brooklyn-usa.org, shows that the effort, which was intended to reinforce the position of the neighborhood as a regional central business district as well as to strengthen the local job base, has contributed to a dramatic increase in residential rather than commercial development, straining the capacity of currently existing infrastructure. While underscoring the successes of the rezoning, including the billions of dollars in private sector investment that the plan helped leverage, Borough President Adams detailed his recommendations for the city to consider a Zoning Text Amendment that will encourage the development of commercial properties in Downtown Brooklyn, as well as measures that will revisit infrastructure needs in the rezoned area and expand opportunities for developing commercial space and affordable housing in the neighborhood.

 

“In many ways, the [2004] rezoning was a success…[but] unfortunately, much of the premise for the rezoning has not been met, namely making Downtown Brooklyn a 21st century business and commercial district,” wrote Borough President Adams in his report. “Downtown Brooklyn is bearing a burden of unanticipated new residential development without a comparable level of infrastructure to sustainably support a growing 24-hour community. The gap between what was assumed for the 2004 analysis and what has been developed warrants a fresh look at how to accommodate past and future growth and direct necessary capital budget investment.”

 

According to Borough President Adams’s review of the Special Downtown Brooklyn Development District’s (SDBD) 2004 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the rezoning of Downtown Brooklyn anticipated the construction of 4.6 million square feet of office space, about 850,000 square feet of retail space and approximately 1,000 units of housing by 2014. Yet, despite the recent announcement of a 420,000 square-foot office building at 420 Albee Square and the commitment by the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) to create additional opportunities for companies that want to relocate in the neighborhood, only 1.3 million square feet of commercial property has been developed — 3.3 million square feet less than had been anticipated. There are more than 11,000 units of housing that have been developed or are in the process of development — compared with 979 units of housing that were expected in the Downtown Brooklyn Plan. In addition, 1,700 hotel rooms have been constructed in the neighborhood — 300 more than anticipated.

 

As a result of increased residential rather than commercial development in the neighborhood, Borough President Adams found the needs of neighborhood residents to be different from the needs anticipated in the Downtown Brooklyn Plan. The public schools to which most local parents send their children have each experienced increases in enrollment; for example, PS 261 Philip Livingston currently exceeds its capacity by 15 percent. In addition, the number of riders travelling through area subway stations has increased more rapidly than in other parts of New York City, an increase of 30 percent from 2002 to 2014 compared with a 24 percent increase system-wide.

 

In addition to investigating the need for a Zoning Text Amendment, Borough President Adams recommended EDC and the New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) convene a task force to revisit infrastructure needs, including a fully built-out Brooklyn Strand, additional transit options, safer pedestrian and cycling connections, as well as improved access to health care facilities. To free up commercial space in Downtown Brooklyn, he reiterated his proposal to relocate government agency functions to sites such as Broadway Junction, in addition to calling for EDC to fast-track its Request for Proposals (RFP) to build additional commercial space in the neighborhood. He also called for expanding affordable housing opportunities, recommending the linking of parking reduction to use of the voluntary affordable housing bonus, as well as the mapping of remaining areas for use of that bonus. Additionally, following the recent announcement by the New York City Department of Education (DOE) of the inclusion of more than 3,000 new seats in the School Construction Authority (SCA’s) updated capital plan, a positive response to Borough President Adams’s letter to SCA President Lorraine Grillo last December, he expressed the need to work in partnership with local stakeholders and the DOE to appropriately locate the additional school sites and accompanying influx of students.

View From Here

By David Mark Greaves

Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton

Senator Bernie Sanders is making Secretary Clinton a far better candidate than she ever would have been without him.  And even if he does not win the nomination, he’s moved the Clinton self-described “pragmatism” needle to the Left, which would not have happened if he were not there. With the Republican “base” unbelievably on the verge of confirming Donald Trump as their best choice for the Office of President of the United States, Secretary Clinton would be tempted to coast as the “I’m not Trump” candidate, without having to be pressed on issues that Senator Sanders gives voice to.  Sanders’ call for a revolution in campaign financing and the financial industry involves more than “one issue”, as anybody on the street can tell you.   Campaign spending alone touches every aspect of our lives.  The lobbyists and the access that hundreds of millions of dollars buys influences everything that goes into our bodies, comes out of our pockets and how we relate to nations around the world.

And the casino-like aspect and sheer greed of the financial industry has become far too dangerous to. There is no tax break financiers and bankers won’t lobby for, as they repeatedly break rules, for which their companies pay fines, while leaving the dreams of families in ruins.  And despite what the senator’s critics say, it is not a crime to tax the rich, it’s just being equitable.  A one-percent tax on wealth, a little something on a stock transfer, and as a modest proposal, because billion-dollar paydays are based on systemic imbalances, the Social Security tax on every dollar earned, no upper limit.  Now I’m no economist, but I bet you three things would happen:  rates for everyone would plummet, benefits would rise and there would be no more talk about a threatened system.

Senator Bernie Sanders

Sanders challenges the notion that incremental change is all that can be achieved and encourages the thought that peaceful revolutions are possible and to see that one is needed, we need look no further than the WMBE program in New York.  President Richard M. Nixon established the Office of Minority Business Enterprise on March 5, 1969 to encourage minority businesses.  As we approach the 47th year of MBE programs, African-Americans, comprising 22.8% of the city, have only .3% of New York City vendor spending.  This is an example of “incremental change” on an almost geologic timescale and it’s why the pragmatists have to be pushed and prodded and led to new possibilities.

 

 

 

The Human Toll of Antonin Scalia’s Time on the Court

Blacks, Latinos, and poor whites suffered because of his draconian approach to criminal punishment.

By Mugambi Jouet, Slate

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

In the days since Antonin Scalia’s death, he has been duly recognized as one of the most impactful justices in the Supreme Court’s history. A critical part of his troubling legacy has long been staring us in the face, although it finally started receiving the public scrutiny it deserves in recent years. As draconian punishments became the norm over the last three decades, the Supreme Court largely rubber-stamped these practices. Justice Scalia played a key role in this process, as his hardline stances on criminal punishment significantly contributed to mass incarceration, numerous executions, and systemic racial discrimination. Scalia was an outspoken supporter of harsh punishments and wanted the court to take an even more hands-off attitude toward so-called “tough on crime” laws.  (Read More)

AS DIVIDED SUPREME COURT IS SET TO CONSIDER GUN BAN FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONVICTIONS, SURVIVORS & ADVOCATES PUSH FOR LEGISLATION TO CLOSE DV GUN LOOPHOLE

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand

New York, NY  As the now-divided U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case next week that could allow many domestic abusers to keep firearms, U.S. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Richard Blumenthal, along with Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., domestic violence survivors and advocates, today urged the passage of new legislation to close DV gun loopholes and prevent domestic abusers from possessing firearms.

Next Monday, February 29th, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear Voisine v. United States, a case that could determine what type of domestic abuse convictions result in the abuser being banned from possessing a firearm. An unfavorable ruling by the now-divided Supreme Court could narrow some states’ ability to prevent abusers from getting a gun and could allow many convicted domestic violence abusers to get or keep guns.

Senators Gillibrand and Blumenthal are pushing for legislation that would help keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers. The Senators are urging congress to pass the Lori Jackson Domestic Survivor Protection Act (S. 1834), a bill to close the temporary restraining order and dating violence loopholes to keep guns out of the hands of more abusers. They are also pushing for the Domestic Violence Gun Homicide Prevention Act of 2015 (S. 2198), legislation that would give states additional resources to remove firearms from domestic abusers. Both pieces of legislation were introduced by Senator Blumenthal in 2015.

“We have a now-divided Supreme Court set to hear a case next week that could allow domestic violence abusers to have guns,” said Senator Gillibrand. “It is important now, more than ever, to close these DV gun loopholes and make sure guns stay out of the hands of domestic abusers. I’m pushing for common sense reforms that will close these loopholes, prevent tragedies, and stop domestic abusers from getting a gun.”ý

U. S. Senator Richard Blumenthal

“The tragic truth is that guns and domestic violence make a deadly mix,” said Senator Blumenthal. “A woman is five time more likely to die in a domestic violence incident if there is a gun in the home. The most dangerous time for a woman is when she ends a relationship– telling her partner, it’s over– but she is often least protected at that time of maximum rage. Temporary court orders in many states permit abusers to retain their guns during those first weeks– until a permanent order is entered, often too late. A temporary court order failed to protect Lori Jackson–gunned down by her estranged husband– and the bill I named for her would close this gaping loophole. Even as the Supreme Court considers this issue, Congress must act to protect against this scourge.”
“The reality of domestic violence is devastating enough for victims and their families; if abusers are allowed to purchase and own guns, it only embolden them to terrorize their victims. We must not allow these individuals the ability to cause even greater pain. As a survivor of gun related domestic violence, I support Senators Gillibrand and Blumenthal for pushing to limit abusers ability to own and purchase guns,” said Doreen Lesane, domestic violence survivor.
“The reason American women are 11 times more likely to be murdered than women in other advanced nations is because it’s so easy for a domestic abuser to get his hands on a gun. When a gun is present in a domestic violence situation, the risk of homicide increases by 500%. In 2014, firearms were used in 29% of intimate partner murders in the state of NY (18% in NYC and 38% upstate). We are advocating to close loopholes in NY State law that allow someone with a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence conviction to keep their guns and to give law enforcement and family members the opportunity to have guns temporarily removed from domestic violence situations. We applaud Senator Gillibrand for addressing the even bigger loopholes in federal law that allow convicted stalkers and abusive dating partners to buy and possess guns. When harm is intended, either towards oneself or others, a gun is the most lethal choice. Congress must do its job and protect women and children by keeping that choice – a gun – away from those intent on harming our most vulnerable citizens,” said Leah Barrett, Executive Director, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence.

The Temporary Restraining Order Loophole
When a domestic violence victim first asks for help, the court can issue a temporary restraining order to immediately protect them during the few days or weeks until the court can issue a permanent restraining order. Current federal law protects domestic violence victims by preventing their abusers from purchasing or possessing a firearm, but only once the court issues a permanent restraining order. The most dangerous time for a victim is when an abuser first learns that his victim has left and only a temporary order is in place. Yet during this time of heightened anger, the abuser is free to keep their firearms or even to purchase new guns. Victims are left unprotected exactly when they are in the most danger.

The Dating Violence Loophole
The current definition of “intimate partner” used to define which abusers cannot purchase or possess a gun only includes abusers who live with, married, or had a child with their victim. The many victims of dating violence who do not live with or have children with their abusers are not protected.

The Facts on Domestic Violence and Guns
*         An average of 760 Americans were killed with guns annually by spouses, ex-spouses or dating partners between 2006 and 2014, according to an Associated Press analysis of FBI and Florida data; more than 80 percent of those killed were women.
*         93% of women killed by men know their murderer, a majority of whom are intimate partners, according to a September 2015 report by theý Violence Policy Center.
*         Domestic assaults are 12 times more likely to be fatal if a gun is involved, according to a Johns Hopkins report.
*         The presence of a gun in a home makes domestic violence five times more likely to lead to murder, according a 2014 report by Everytown for Gun Safety.
*         American women are 11 times more likely to be shot to death than women in other developed countries, according to Everytown for Gun Safety.