Home Blog Page 1142

Charles Barron: On a Mission and Track to Lead

… Charles Barron still brings the fire. Burning questions in the minds of “critical thinkers” are: what’s he done lately for the community? What legislation has he passed?
Why can’t he step aside and bring in some new blood? Is Barron “for real?”

Many folks in Barron’s 42nd Councilmatic District of Brownsville-East New York hardly find the questions relevant.

Country hangs out on Stanley Avenue.  He happened to have been coming out of the Hair Cutz barbershop when he spotted his two heroes, The Rev. Al Sharpton and Councilman Charles Barron, across the street on Van Siclen Avenue, Friday, July 31.

They had just left the IS166-George Gershwin School tour stop and jumping into their vehicle to head South to another site.  Didn’t matter to Country that they didn’t have time to speak to him.

Standing with his Uncle Leon next to his van in the middle of Van Siclen Avenue in front of George Gershwin High School in East New York, Country hammered his chest with a closed fist, and yelled, as Charles Barron’s vehicle passed by, “You got my heart, man!”

Then he extended the full length of his arm into the air like a spear, slow-rising, “You got my heart.”

And that shout out was echoed by a local pizza owner.  When asked who he considered to be the most powerful leader in Brooklyn. “Just one: Barron.”

Barron wanted to bring attention to his work in the community, and he admittedly got ours when he brought in his long-time friend The Rev. Al to tour his neighborhood.  The objective was more than to network with his fellow hell (and consciousness) -raiser.    He wanted to deliver a message.

“I really want to show the other side of the value of participating in electoral politics.  I have maintained my voice, and I didn’t compromise anything.  You can be progressive; you don’t have to take the establishment line.  You can work from within, not play the game and still get things done for the community.”

“I’m from the old school,” said Country, “Been there; done that.  New people have to learn; some learning through the grapevine; others thought the roots.  Charles has done his time on the ground, and he learned during the 70’s when people were people.  Only a few people doin’ something for the community; everybody else is waitin’ for somebody else to do it for them.  It’s time to wake up. And he’s louder and blacker than ever.”

Two neighborhood mothers basically said the same.  One of them, Edith Jenkins, a 26-year resident of the neighborhood told us:  “Whenever there’s something going on in the community he checks it out, even if it’s just for a second, but he comes by and supports us if we have things out here; it’s a big thing – Fathers Day, and he’s here. My son has a football league called the Warriors; he also donates toys to the kids, he tries to get them out of the streets.”

This does not add up to a whole lot of dollars, and with Charles’ schedule, it does not add up to very much time to “drop by.”  He had just returned from the Middle East, thousands of miles away from the 42nd District, on business that on the surface may have little to do with matters of home.

In fact, Barron says he really has been taking care of business in 42, particularly in the area of housing and parks. Edith Jenkins knows of what she speaks: Big money has gone into parks in his district.  The Venable Park, the Linden/Gershwin Park and Brownsville Recreation Space are receiving a combined $14.5 million dollars worth of upgrades and development.

The Linden Houses neighborhood will be a beneficiary of new senior units, family units, a parking lot, and a new center; George Gershwin middle school’s recording studio will be outfitted with state of the art high technology and new computers.

And another major project, a possible extension of the Gateway Mall, will add 2,000 units of housing, two new parks, a new school and a supermarket.  He’s hoping to secure thousands of jobs, and “instead of having a new mall, we’re going to secure a space for local businesses who will get low rent.”  He also insured a job training program, office space sites and other gains with a Community Benefits Agreement.

He’s partnering with Rev. David Brawley, co-chair of the East Brooklyn Congregations (EBC) that’s bringing in affordable rental apartments designed for low-income families making 50 and 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI).

So, while it may be no secret at City Hall, it was a surprise to us that Barron is at the very top of the Council list of members who bringing in Affordable Housing to the community.

Through his tour with Sharpton that balmy day, Barron wanted to get out another message: “to show the other side of the value of participating in electoral politics. You can be progressive; you don’t have to take the establishment line; you can be outspoken; you can work from within. And not the play the game. I have maintained my voice, my blackness and I didn’t compromise anything.”

While housing and the economy are high up on Barron’s list, there are other concerns that keep him up at night, and bear a tremendous weight.  The shootings, the phone calls.
“It’s when I come home. I have to sit down. I wonder if another phone call’s coming.  I’m suddenly at the scene of a killing, or with a family in an emergency,” he said.

“I don’t seek these cases; 99% of the time, people call me.  ‘We want to have a press conference, to put the truth out there about our loved ones.’  I always ask them first: is this something you really want to do?  I go through the entire process of explaining the pros and cons of calling the media.  I’m not trying to get media attention for myself. And most of the time, these families want to just get the media to present a picture of their loved one as someone who is loved and not the person who might be projected. They want me to talk about their humanity, to get the message out that they want justice.

“The media has used the term ambulance-chasing,” he said. “We are not chasing the ambulance; we are the ambulance.”

Andrea Webb, who’s lived all her life since 1970, on Stanley Avenue, said, “If you are for the people and want to help the kids, you got my support and my vote. He has mine.”

For Barron, the questions may boil down to one – is he there for us when we need him, whether near or far. So you’ve got to wonder: if someone like Barron takes an about face on term limits, does it really matter to the people on the ground – like Country, Andrea, Edith and the barbers at Hair Cutz – who are looking for a leader they believe cares for them?

“We lost a lot of people to crack and murder,” says Country, who works in a funeral home. “I’m tired of looking at so many dead people. People need a way out of this hole. Need to get off that daydream and make that dream a reality.  Anybody daydreamin’ ain’t doing nothin’ but sendin’ up air. Charles Barron’s not a daydream leader. ”

(Part II: August 27)

Major Owens Endorses John Liu, Warns of the “Donocracy”

There was wistfulness about the Major Owens endorsement of Councilman John Liu on Monday at his congressional office where he’s been for 24 years.  “We’re moving out in September,” the congressman said. “This is the last event we’ll be having here.” Before getting to the endorsement of Councilman Liu, the former congressman spoke of the issue of how issues of unfairness in the way “member items” or “earmarks”, the monies distributed at the discretion of individual lawmakers, cross federal, state and local levels.  After his Medgar Evers students had researched the City Council, he found that “Speaker Christine Quinn received 10 times more than any council member in Brooklyn.”
Owens and Liu agree clear that they were not against member items, but rather how they are distributed.  Owens contends that these items are a way for local politicians to answer some of the very local needs of the community.  What he has a problem with is that “these items should be distributed equally across the membership.  They all represent the same number of people, the items should be distributed equally.”
Owens spoke of Liu as someone who he trusts as “a professional finance person not connected with what I call the ‘Donocracy’ of New York,” which he described as a pool of people and institutions that funds any candidate that may win in return for access to power.  According to Owens, a prime example of a beneficiary of the Donocracy, a “creature” of it as he says, is David Yassky, apparently a man for whom Owens does not have much respect, calling him “an empty suit, interested only in power.”   Adding “John Liu is not owned by the Donocracy.”
Congressman Owens is adding his name to a long list of Liu supporters including 1199 SEIU, District Council 37 and many other unions and a wide cross section of politicians.
Answering a question on contracting, Liu said that the Bloomberg trend toward large single suppliers in the city purchasing system goes against efforts to include small and minority-owned enterprises.  He wants to go to smaller bids so more small firms can participate.  Liu said that with passage of legislation in Albany, the City Comptroller now has the authority to go into the Department of Education and audit their purchasing procedures.
On the question of whether the Comptroller’s office would play a role in ensuring that minority-worker components were adhered to in stimulus-related construction, Liu said ensuring a fair distribution of jobs was his highest priority.
Reflecting on his work on the council Transportation Committee, he was struck by how much work was contracted out to only two firms.  Liu feels that much of the work could be done by city workers, and that billions of dollars are going outside the city and at the same time, city workers are deprived of opportunities.
.
Asked if he would be satisfied and stay in the Comptroller’s office were he to win, Liu said he’d serve his 4-year term and another if he could, but admitted, “Hey, I’m hungry.  I’d like to be president.”    You heard it here first.

The Disturbing Case of the Estate of Judge John L. Phillips

“The Brooklyn Supreme Court Guardianship Program has been hijacked by Mafia-style crime”, charges Reverend Samuel Boykin, court-appointed guardian for Judge John Phillips, the “Kung Fu Judge.”   Phillips was a Brooklyn Civil Court Judge for 13 years serving two terms between 1976 and 1994.  Boykin is the first family member in a long line of court-appointed guardians to take charge of Judge Phillips’ estate after he was declared mentally incompetent by District Attorney Charles Hynes’ office in 2001.
His story should serve as a cautionary tale for all.
“Judge John L. Phillips said to me regularly that if all of these illegal activities can be successfully committed against a judge, they can be committed against anyone,” says Reverend Boykin.
That the tale is long and sordid is a matter of record.   Writing in Our Time Press in 2007, reporter Mary Alice Miller has chronicled many of the misdeeds and charges.  The New York Law Journal  has had extensive coverage.  In the hands of judge-appointed guardians, the estate has gone from a value of over $10 million  to $18,000 and three properties, including the famous Slave Theater on Harriet Ross Tubman Avenue, aka Fulton Street.
So far only Maria Leyna Albertina and attorney Emani P. Taylor have paid a price for their roles in the saga.  Ms. Albertina was sentenced in January to 5-15 years for mortgage fraud activity, some of which involved Judge Phillips’ property.  Attorney Taylor, a former interim guardian for Judge Phillips, has been suspended from the practice of law.  As reported in the New York Law Journal, January 2008, a unanimous panel of Justices in the Appellate Division wrote that, “At a minimum, [Taylor] withdrew funds from the guardianship account as legal fees without court permission, at worst, she intentionally converted guardianship funds.”  She was later ordered to repay $403,149 for mishandling the Judge’s affairs.    An application has been made to The Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection to recoup those monies.  The fund responded on April 23rd of this year that in addition to needing proof of payment and various other conditions met, “The Fund must await the conclusion of the underlying disciplinary matters pending against Ms. Taylor before proceeding further.”
Of larger concern is what has happened to judicial oversight of the court-appointed guardians and of the whole Guardianship program.   As Boykin says in his complaint to Comptroller William Thompson, “There were 12 judges involved in the Judge John L. Phillips Guardianship case, either involved in overseeing the case as presiding judges, issuing decision orders, judicial hearing judges, administrator judges, judges sealing records.   We believe none of these judges are legally able to state they were not aware of the illegal activities going on in the Judge John L. Phillips Guardianship case, we believe the case is a good example” of the need for oversight of the Guardianship program.
Reverend Boykin has also filed a complaint with Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s Public Integrity Bureau.   They, in turn, have referred the matter to Ms. Sherrill Spatz, Inspector General of the New York State Unified Court System, writing, “After careful review of the documents, we have determined that the issues mentioned pertain to your office….for whatever action you deem appropriate.”
In his letter to Assistant District Attorney Robert Renzulli in the Asset Forfeiture Bureau of D.A. Charles Hynes’ office, Boykin outlines how the Phillips estate has been systematically looted by mortgage fraud including “illegal conveyances, illegal sales and forgery of deeds.”  And he asks if anyone is going to pay for these crimes?
We should start to hear other shoes dropping in this case.  If not, then the silence will mark the all clear for business as usual, and the only thing sure other than death and taxes will be mortgage and financial fraud as legal vultures pick over the estates of primarily the weak and sick, but really, anyone at all.

How to Survive a Double Whammy? Keep the Faith

P.G. Wodehouse once wrote, “You can’t make an omelet unless you break a few eggs,”   and in order to get to a sound economy, we first have to go through transformative times. “We needed to get here,” said Zane Tankel, owner of 34 Applebee’s on the East Coast, including the one we were sitting in at Restoration Plaza, on Harriet Ross Tubman Avenue, aka Fulton Street, the heart of Bedford-Stuyvesant, where all the workers called him Zane.  “I’m a student of the economy,” said the Wharton School of Business graduate. Toxic mortgages are only Phase 1, according to Tankel.  “Phase 2 will be when the good mortgages begin to respond to rising unemployment”, which he predicts will be about 11%-12% nationally.
“And we needed to get here,” says Tankel, speaking of a consumption-driven system that had become unsustainable.  “The consumer in America had too much choice” with the only difference between products being brand names,  contends Tankel.  But with brand names clamoring for attention, retailers were forced to carry large inventories, across too many brands and “inventory is money sitting in a box”, he says.
Tankel’s comments were born out in a just-released report by the NFIB survey on small businesses.  “Small business owners continued to liquidate inventories. A net negative
27 percent of all owners reported gains in inventory stocks (more firms cut stocks than added to them, seasonally adjusted), unchanged from April and May which posted record lows. Inventories have been reduced at a record pace, continuing 25 months of negative readings in a row. It is hard to believe there is anything left on the shelves.”
For those looking for a quick turnaround, quick being a year, there will only be  disappointment he says.  “An upturn is always triggered by the consumer, but with the high unemployment, there’s no one to buy.  Retail sales are still struggling.” Tankel says that “this system will be going through a resetting process” as a new reality takes hold.
“For retailers, that means closing unprofitable stores, stocking less and hiring fewer stock clerks.”  This, in turn, cascades down through all of the industries and job descriptions  that are interconnected in varying degrees.  Whether it’s fewer truckloads, fewer dockworkers or fewer patrons at the highway diner, there will “simply be less of everything” and we’re gong to have to ride it out.
As Tankel says, “All of these changes are happening underneath”, and that’s the problem the Obama Administration is working with.  “I know some of the real players, Obama’s right-hand people” who are tasked with managing the economy, he says. “Most of the Geithner team projections dealt with the most optimistic turnaround in the economy.  “We’re going to have to do another trillion in” as a stimulus, he says.  “I said about a year ago that we’re not coming out of this soon.”
And of course, mixed in with all of this, is that across all businesses, particularly small businesses that hold the bulk of the national hiring, there is the increased use of technology as a means of production, consolidate professions and job slots into computer programs and longer nights.
Tankel insists he is not a “doomsayer” but an optimist who is also a realist.  “In a best-case scenario, we’ll bump along on the bottom like we are now for maybe another year or so.”
That Zane is an optimist cannot be denied, because he is putting his money on the table, opening three restaurants at the very moment the nation is going through this economic storm.  “It helps to be a little crazy,” he says by way of explanation.  “I’m by nature a risk-taker,” not a surprising statement from someone who has climbed Mt. Everest on an  expedition without Sherpas, they call it traveling light.   “I’m not driven by money but by excellence.  This is an opportunity to get some great sites at strategic pricing.  We’re going to Jamaica Avenue in Queens where the rents a year ago were literally double what they are now.  So if I can get in at half-price, I have to do it.  If unemployment goes to 15%, that means 85% are working.  I like those odds.  That’s how I do it and that’s what I tell our people.  Right now with unemployment at 9.5%, that means 90.5% percent of people are working.  We can’t be down or depressed about that.  Ninety percent of the people we need to put in our restaurants can come there.  “It’s all about the attitude. Maybe if you see me driving a delivery truck in a few years, you’ll know I guessed wrong.”
Carl, a manager, was leaving and stopped at the table and Tankel asked about his daughter. After Carl left Zane said, “He’s a single father, I saw him shopping at Atlantic Terminal with his daughter and we had lunch.”  Actually, Carl was only one of a succession of hellos and hugs as employees stopped by and were greeted by name.  Zane takes pride in knowing the names of almost 4,000 employees.  “I work at it and I know how important it is to them,” said Zane, noting that as he said to them at the initial training sessions with employees, “I know if you’re happy, the guest will be happy.  I know if you’re unhappy, the guest will be unhappy.”
Helping with morale is the prospect of a career with the company, moving from server into management.    Doshia King (See sidebar) is the young woman from Bed-Stuy to go into our management program.
Asked about Applebee’s reputation for giving formerly incarcerated people a fair chance at being hired, Zane says he’s had good experiences “and that’s why I continue to reach out.  Do we win every time? No.”
We suggested that most people see “formerly incarcerated” on a resume and it’s the kiss of death.  “We don’t do it that way.  People are able to pay a price and move on. When we opened this restaurant, more than half were formerly incarcerated.”
What is most surprising about that is the level of competition faced in the initial hiring.  “We interviewed several thousand people for what wound up to be seventy jobs,” and as he told them at that first meeting, they had not just been hired, but rather selected.  He reminded them that they were special.
We asked Zane why he came into Bedford-Stuyvesant with unemployment so high.
“There has always been a high unemployment rate in Bed Stuy, we knew that coming in.  we weren’t strangers here. I spent more time in Bed-Stuy than any site we had.  Most people were running from Bed-Stuy.  I would come here at all hours and watch the traffic flows and the people and found that most folks were pretty nice.  99% of the people are families just want what every other people do.  And you don’t turn your back on a neighborhood because of a bad 1%.   We felt this could be a paradigm for Bed-Stuy.  I tell people if they want to see a really well run restaurant, go to Bed-Stuy.
“Look, there’s about 150,000 people in Bed-Stuy, and if 50% are unemployed that mean 75,000 are employed.  That’s more than enough for us.  We can only seat 200.
I did not do this philanthropically on the one hand, but on the other hand I thought it was good give and take. Service a community, make money, without ripping people off.
Zane acknowledged that business has fallen off with the construction going on and a shroud-like netting over the entrance. “Look, when this Restoration Plaza gets finished, it’s going to be so “out of sight, it’s going to be worth the wait.  It’s going to be over the top.  We wanted to have a jazz combo on the terrace, but we’ll do it next year.  Nothing comes without sacrifice so we’re sacrificing now.  We just have to grin and bear it.”

Sidebar:

On A Career Path- Doshia King

Doshia attended Ebenezer Preparatory School and Boys and Girls High School during the Mickens era.  She says,   “Frank Mickens was the most incredible educator I’ve ever come in contact with.  He always wanted not only his students to succeed  but the Black and Hispanic community.  He was a father figure to a lot of people.”  She attended Medgar Evers College for 2 years then got her Bachelor’s in Hospitality Management from New York College of Technology where she had the opportunity to intern at Disney World to complete her degree.  “I got hired in 2006 and started as a server for about three months, then moved to bartending for about a year-and-a-half.  Then I became a Neighborhood Expert, someone who trains new people and then moved on to supervisor.”    She then moved to the “back of the house,” where she cooked, broiled and prepared food for the plate. After 8 weeks in the MIT, (Managers-in-Training), Doshia is an official manager in Astoria. And will be the service manager of a restaurant opening in the Bronx. “I’ve been with the company for 3 ½ years and I guess my progression has been fast.  I want to be a general manager of a store and eventually perhaps an area manager in years to come.”
Asked what she liked most about the company, Doshia replied, “They appreciate the work you do.”

Year-by-Year Analysis of the Bush Tax Cuts Shows Growing Tilt to the Very Rich

A study released June 12, 2002, by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Children=s Defense Fund, reveals for the first time who stands to benefit from the 2001-enacted Bush tax cuts in each year from 2001 through 2010. Among the key findings:
* Over the ten-year period, the richest Americans–the best-off one percent–are slated to receive tax cuts totaling almost half a trillion dollars. The $477 billion in tax breaks the Bush administration has targeted to this elite group will average $342,000 each over the decade.
* By 2010, when (and if) the Bush tax reductions are fully in place, an astonishing 52 percent of the total tax cuts will go to the richest one percent, whose average 2010 income will be $1.5 million. Their tax-cut windfall in that year alone will average $85,000 each. Put another way, of the estimated $234 billion in tax cuts scheduled for the year 2010, $121 billion will go just to 1.4 million taxpayers.
* Although the rich have already received a hefty down payment on their Bush tax cuts–averaging just under $12,000 each this year–80 percent of their windfall is scheduled to come from tax changes that won=t take effect until after this year, mostly from items that phase in after 2005.
* In contrast, the vast majority of taxpayers have already received most of their tax cuts from the 2001 legislation.
* For the four out of five families and individuals making less than $73,000 this year, three-quarters of the tax cuts–averaging about $350 this year–are already in place.
* Tax cuts for the 19 percent of taxpayers making between $73,000 and $356,000 this year will grow a little over the next four years as the cuts in the upper tax rates continue to kick in, but then will dwindle thereafter. By 2010, the tax cuts for this group will be no bigger as a share of income than they are now.
*As a result, freezing the Bush tax cuts at their 2002 levels would have little or no effect on 99 percent of the taxpayers, whose tax cuts are already mostly or completely Afrozen.@ Only the best-off one percent of the taxpayers will receive significant additional tax cuts if the rest of the Bush tax program continues to be implemented.
Citizens for Tax Justice