Home Blog Page 1235

Kenyan Woman Wins Nobel Peace Prize

By Danielle Douglass
As the first African woman to win a Nobel Peace Prize, Professor Wangari Maathai, 65, has left an indelible mark on the struggle for environmental and social justice. As founder of the Green Belt Movement, in her native Kenya, Maathai has led thousands of Kenyan women in a crusade to protect environmental resources by planting over 30 million trees.
On Saturday March 5, Professor Maathai appeared on WBAI’s Afrikaleidoscope with Elombe Brath. I sat in on the taping of the radio show, captivated by Maathai’s passion and pure joy in working towards restoring balance between the earth and its inhabitants. She exuded confidence without a trace of arrogance, seemingly humbled by acknowledgement of her accomplishments and grounded by the reality of the work ahead. “[The Nobel Peace Prize] is not an honor for a single person, this is a moment for humanity, a moment to understand that what has been honored is the struggle of millions of people all over the world. The Nobel Committee has decided that it wants to recognize these people by saying that the environment, democratic space and peace are inseparable causes; for those of us who work in these areas we must see them as such in order to bring all of these movements together to truly create a better world,” said Maathai.
Since winning the Nobel Peace Prize in October of 2004, Wangari Maathai has been at the forefront of the international stage, promoting environmental conservation and community development. She is an example of the boundless potential of grassroots organizing, and the Nobel Committee’s recognition of her movement’s success has brought attention to the triumph of self-determination.
During the 1970s Kenya, like many other East African countries, began noticing the damaging effects of logging and the conversion of natural forests into commercial agricultural land. The deforestation, or cutting down of trees, involved in both processes created a rippling effect, that would be felt for decades to come. Environmental experts say that a forest cover of 10% is required for a country to sustain life naturally – availability of rain, availability of underground water, soil fertility, clean air and prevention of soil erosion; at the time Kenya’s forest cover was less than 2%. Although the government made an effort to counter the problem by creating tree plantations, they only further complicated the issue as the imported trees began to kill off native vegetation, which had a greater capacity for retaining water to be later released in forms of streams and rivers.
Like many other Kenyans Professor Maathai observed the alarming trend, at the time she was an active member of the National Council of Women of Kenya. Through that forum she became privy to the how deforestation effected the day to day living of many families. Maathai listened to rural women who complained about the lack of firewood (a main source of fuel in the region), clean drinking water, food and income. In 1977 she established the Green Belt Movement, focused on planting trees in order to conserve the environment and improve the overall quality of life; after all trees provide clean air, clean drinking water, enriched soil for food and a source of income (through the sale of firewood and fruits).

Professor Maathai with activist Elombe Brath on WBAI’s Afrikaleidoscope (99.5FM Thurs. 9pm)

During her acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway, Maathai said, “Tree planting became a natural choice to address some of the initial basic needs identified by women. Also, tree planting is simple, attainable and guarantees quick, successful results within a reasonable amount of time, which sustains interest and commitment.” Her ingenuity empowered thousands of women to take a personal role in sustaining their environment and working towards ensuring a healthy future for their families.
As Green Belt’s core of committed members grew the organization broadened its horizons and began to campaign for improvements in education, women’s rights, and the democratic process. However, not everyone was impressed or encouraged by Maathai’s activism, for much of the 1980s and 1990s Green Belt went head to head with Kenya’s then president Daniel Arap Moi, whose vision of progress was not inclusive of the needs of the people. One particular incident, which gained Green Belt notoriety was the regime’s plans to build a 60-story skyscraper in Uhuru Park, one of the few remaining expanses of greenery left in the capital city. Professor Maathai took legal action to stop construction, and although her case was dismissed her protest gained so much international attention, particularly in Western countries that provided Kenya with necessary aid, that the project was eventually abandoned. </! P
Other confrontations were far more violent as Maathai was arrested and once beaten unconscious by police for demonstrating against the government’s environmental practices. “If you try to promote justice and equity you are going to be an enemy of those who want to control, who want to exploit, who want to be in charge at the expense of others,” said Maathai. Wangari Maathai recognizes that she is lucky to be alive, as so many of her comrades throughout the world, like Ken Saro-Wiwa of Nigeria and Chico Mendes of Brazil, died for their commitment to environmentalism.
Undeterred by the threat of violence and struggle, Wangari Maathai continued to speak out against corruption and political greed, even unsuccessfully running for president in 1997. By 2002 President Arap Moi stepped down from power, ushering in a more environmentally progressive regime under the leadership of Emilio Mwai Kibaki. In the same election, Maathai was elected to Parliament with 98% of the votes, and by 2003 she was appointed as the Deputy Minister of the Environment.
Through her years of progressive work with the environment, Wangari Maathai began to see the inextricable connection between the “sustainable management of the earth’s resources” and obtaining world peace. Many of the military conflicts of the 20th and 21st centuries have been fought over natural resources: oil in the Middle East, minerals and land in Africa; which speaks to the need for a less self-indulgent approach to management of the world’s resources. With the recent enactment of the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, which calls for the reduction of carbon emissions, environmentalists’ work to create a more environmentally sound future is coming to fruition. Over 141 countries have signed the agreement; however, the major emitter of greenhouse gas, the United States, has yet to get on board. Yet Maathai is encouraged by the millions of citizens in this country who are still adhering to the principles of the agreement. “Eventually it will be the citizens of this country that will put enough pressure on their governments, but it will come from the citizens themselves agreeing that they want to change their consumptive patterns,” said Professor Maathai.
Maathai is a strong believer in self-determination, a principle that has remained a mainstay of her movement. Her advocacy for self-resilience for the people of Kenya, can be easily applied to any struggle for liberation, particularly that of people of color in this country. “I wanted to empower our people to understand that the solutions to their problems lie within them, and while there may be many forces that want to keep them where they are, that would almost want to see them remain impoverished, remain dis-empowered.we have power within us and we can do things for ourselves. All that is needed is a commitment, patience and persistence,” said Maathai. “Things don’t happen overnight. If you plant a tree today it will not give you fruits tomorrow; you have to have the patience and the persistence to stay there and make sure it survives.”
Wangari Maathai attributes much of her success to those who have come before her, the revolutionaries such as Martin Luther King and the Mau Mau, who fought for her freedom, a freedom that has allowed her to carry on their mission of ensuring a prosperous future for all humankind.

HIV/AidsPrevention begins and ends with self-esteem

By Danielle Douglass
Within the last few years, national HIV/AIDS rates for Black women have steadily increased, according to the most recent data released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2003, the most recent year for which statistics are available, HIV/AIDS rates for Black women were 19 times higher than white women and 5 times the rate for Hispanic women; Black women’s rates also surpassed those of males of all races/ethnicities other than Black men.
What makes these alarming statistics even more disturbing is that Black women make up less than 15% of the U.S. female population, yet they represent 64% of all new AIDS cases among women in the United States. AIDS has become the leading cause of death among Black women ages 25-32. What are these statistics telling us as Black women? What are we doing to ourselves or allowing others to do to us?
The distressing health trend among young Black women has led to much speculation about the root cause. For the most part the media has presented the same narrow scope of explanations; relying heavily on poverty and the “down-low” scenario. Granted these two components are major contributing factors to the spike in HIV/AIDS cases among Black women, but like any other health or social crisis, the issue must be thoroughly examined from all angles, particularly that which is cultural and psychological.
Truthful Discourse
Heterosexual sex is the leading cause of HIV infection among Black women; within recent years over 81% of Black women diagnosed with HIV/AIDS were believe to have contracted the disease through unprotected sex. One of the more highly publicized explanations for this statistic has been the rise in cases of Black men who secretly engaged in homosexual sex, while sleeping with women. Many HIV/AIDS advocates are speculating whether these men living on “the down low” function as an HIV transmission bridge to heterosexual populations. In a recent study of HIV-infected people, 34% of Black men who sleep with men reported having had sex with women, even though only 6% of Black women reported having sex with a bisexual man. It is apparent that many brothers are not being truthful with the women they are involved with, let alone themselves.
However, the incessant media focus on this one contributing factor in the HIV/AIDS crisis seems somewhat suspicious. It appears that the mainstream press wants to vilify Black men, while taking attention away from other pressing issues, such as inadequate access to healthcare. Often preventing and treating illness depends on people’s ability to access high-quality medical care. In central Brooklyn alone, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reports that approximately 29,000 residents are without health insurance, while approximately 30,000 residents did not get needed medical care in the past year. The CDC claims that nearly half of all HIV-infected people are not getting access to necessary antiviral drugs. Treatment can be a central factor in prevention; HIV anti-viral drugs can decrease levels of the virus in the body, minutely reducing the chances that users will infect others.
Yet much of the news about HIV/AIDS rates within the Black community still focuses on the sensationalist stories of Black men living on “the down low.” One has to wonder if the media is not just playing into historical stereotypes of Black men as sexual deviants and a potential threat to society. Granted we must delve into how homophobia in the Black community hinders open and honest discourse, but it is equally important to delve into how inadequate healthcare is a major aspect of the increasing trend.
Sexually transmitted diseases further complicate the issue of HIV/AIDS transmission among Black women. According to the CDC, Blacks were 20 times as likely as whites to have gonorrhea and 5.2 times as likely to have syphilis. Partly because of physical changes caused by STDs, including genital lesions that can serve as an entry point for HIV, the presence of certain STDs can increase one’s chances of contracting HIV by 3 to 5-fold.
Many Black women know about safe sex practices and their ability to reduce the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS; however, denying their own risk, neglect to adopt them. Much of this behavior can be attributed to issues of cultural norms and self-esteem. We are a people who can listen to songs about explicit sexual encounters, but cannot bring ourselves to honestly discuss sexual behavior with our children, particularly our girls. Although Black women are readily portrayed in pop culture as being highly sexualized, there is no sense that we have ownership of our sexuality, which leaves us vulnerable to emotional and physical exploitation in our relationships. Self-love is a key aspect of self-esteem and loving yourself makes you less likely to play Russian roulette with your life. If you are willing to give your body to someone, there should be no hesitation in asking them about their sexual history, wearing a condom or better yet taking them with you to get tested.
Prevention begins and ends with self-esteem; taking precautions to make sure you don’t contract the disease and being honest in your intimate relationships if you do have HIV/AIDS.

Not you’re Average “Joe”: Crimes & Misdemeanors in the Race for Brooklyn DA

By Terrence M. Winston
Incumbent Charles “Joe” Hynes is looking to be re-elected to the Brooklyn District Attorney office for an unprecedented fifth term. Several newspapers (including this one) have reported on the alleged improper use and abuse of power that DA Hynes and his office exercise. Power, he’s not ready to relinquish. But there is one candidate that has him looking over his shoulder, again: Sandra Roper. Four years ago Ms. Roper, on a hope and a prayer budget, lassoed nearly 37% of the votes; widening the eyes of many political pundits who assumed that her chances of winning were nil. For Ms. Roper this race is more than just about winning a powerful position free of term limits, she says that, “It’s all for the people of Brooklyn, because they deserve better.”
The real tale behind the scramble for the office of District Attorney is something out of a Machiavelli children’s story. Both current and former candidates challenging Hynes have felt his fangs puncture their images and suck the life out of their campaigns; they have suffered strategically timed indictments, being thrown off ballots, and having personal assets seized. Ms. Roper, who recently defeated accusations and charges of forgery and fraud by a former client, for the second time (first before a grievance committee which found no fault; then before a hung jury) is continuing a battle initially waged by retired Judge John L. Philips and campaign compatriot John O’Hara. O’Hara, a campaign adviser for Ms. Roper and former political aspirant, says he has had, “three trials and ten appeals,” after having been indicted on voter fraud by the DA’s office. Eventually he was convicted; a felony that cost him $20,000 and 1500 hours of community service (which he is still serving) and disbarment.
 Judge Philips is remembered as one of the many colorful personalities that graced the Bedford-Stuyvesant community for years. According to Ms. Roper, he was coined “the Kung-Fu Judge” for running his own martial arts dojo on Nostrand Avenue and dispensing “Kung-Fu Justice” in the courtrooms. He instructed students on his “gorilla-gnat” martial art style, a hybrid developed after years of study in the Far East. He was also a neighborhood real estate magnate, owning several properties valued at an estimated $10 million. One of those properties is the closed Slave Theatre on Fulton St. off Bedford Avenue, where generations of community residents went to have their minds and spirits nourished by the lectures of some of our finest scholars.
Described by O’Hara as “a rebel,” Phillips served 13 distinguished years on the bench in Brooklyn’s courts. In 2001, Mr. Phillips aided by Mr. O’Hara, then a political gadfly with political roots in Sunset Park, decided to make a second attempt at running for Brooklyn DA  His first try in 1997, was thwarted when he got kicked off of the ballot, an easy accomplishment due to the way the rules are set up. A candidate gets on the ballot by filling out petitions signed by registered voters. Apparently any mistakes made on the petitions; a misspelled name, wrong address or abbreviation, can result in that candidate being disqualified and an opponent has the right to challenge the authenticity of a candidate’s petitions. The result can be extended court sessions, a lot of wasted time and denying voters a greater variety of choice. Part of O’Hara’s responsibility in the 2001 campaign was to assure that Judge Phillips got and remained on the ballot.
It was during this time that Ms. Roper was being encouraged to run for City Council. A Panamanian immigrant who began her career in the pharmaceutical industry, Roper never had aspirations to serve in public office. Describing herself as, “generally a grassroots person,” her interests have always been with the residents in the Bed-Stuy community, specifically the elderly. She was busy nurturing the NAACP legal clinic, her creation, and battling against predatory lending (a process where certain banks and mortgage companies prey on the ignorance or desperation of low income loan applicants, making the terms such that it is impossible to repay the often exorbitant interests rates, leaving them vulnerable to foreclosure) by using her considerable skill as an attorney to provide services that helped to improve the lives of the people in the community. As is often the case with those who facilitate change for others, Roper was unaware that she too was being affected by change.
The tentacles of DA Hynes’ office had tightened its grip on the life and assets of Judge Phillips. Hynes claimed that Philips was suffering some kind of dementia and was in danger of being taken advantage of by financial predators. The court ruled that Phillips was incapable of handling his personal affairs and appointed a temporary legal guardian who seized control of his assets. Judge Phillips no longer lives in Brooklyn. On December 28. 2004, he was moved from the Bronx VA Hospital to the East Haven Nursing & Rehab Center where he’s currently living. After it became obvious that Judge Phillips wouldn’t be able to continue his quest for office, Ms. Roper took up the baton and is anchoring the final leg of the race.
O’Hara is still licking his wounds too. A compelling figure in all of this, he has the dubious distinction of being the only other person since Susan B. Anthony in 1876, to be convicted of a felony over a suffrage law. In spite of his challenges he feels that what was done and is being done to Judge Phillips is the real crime. Acknowledging the DA’s misuse of power as a symptom of a larger political disease he says, “Prosecutors are above the law.” O’Hara believes Hynes is worried that Roper, based on how many votes she received in the 2001 election, may eat more votes in this election thereby potentially unseating him. He also cited that Liz Holzman is the only other woman to serve as DA in Brooklyn (coincidentally the person whom Hynes replaced in ’89) adding, “There is a bias in voting for women for DA. Sandra is the type of person who should be the Brooklyn DA.”
Ms. Roper has big plans for Brooklyn. The death penalty and the Rockefeller drug laws are two issues she takes an uncompromising stand against. Her first words at the beginning of the interview were, “If you want to stand for justice, it starts with a clean hand and a clean heart.” The Brooklyn criminal justice system could use a good cleansing. www.Roper2005.com Comments can be sent to this address: gyenyameknight@aol.com
(As of this writing DA Hynes could not be reached for comment)

DOUBLE THE EFFORT; NOT THE STANDARD

by Roslyn E. Bacon
By the age of twenty-three, his youngest assailant had learned the lesson of hate.  Why hadn’t he learned it by age forty-nine?  Shouldn’t he have known better?  It was during the wee hours of  Sunday morning; all drunk:  three white males-in a pick up-on a dark Texas road. One black male-on foot-been drinking and he accepts their offer for a ride?  Even the predictably anti Black everything, Rent-A-Toms took a pass on this outrageous display of inhumanity.  Perhaps the reality of their own colored liability forced them into quiet reflection. The dastardly murder of James Byrd, Jr., on that fateful June morning, in 1998, sent America into national  rigor mortis. No one was recorded asking those questions; rather, the wisest among us questioned the unbelievable act of barbarity.  And that is how it should have been.

Fast forward to the year, 2003, and head northwest, about 150 miles, from the infamous Jasper decapitation site.  December 4, to be exact.  A thirtysomething Black woman witnesses the murder of her mother, Janice Reebes, by her then boyfriend, Terrance Dwayne “Popeye” Kelly.  The single shot to her mother’s stomach was followed by the life altering shot to her own head, leaving Carolyn Thomas, today, with half of a face.

There was no phalanx of clergy and elected officials descending upon Waco, Texas, decrying the horrendous act; as there had been to Jasper.  The final services for Ms. Reebes mother was not attended by scores of resurrected 1960’s super heroes; i.e., the NEW Black Panthers; the NEW Fruit of Islam; or the same old rhetoricians declaring how fired up they were and weren’t “gonna take it no mo’!” No Presidential message; no commissions created; no town hall meetings.  After all, one in two women, in
America, will experience a violent relationship in her lifetime.  Women are treated in the emergency room for domestic violence in larger numbers than for rapes, muggings and vehicular incidents combined. The response to the violence against Black women from the Black community is summed up in the words of CC in Gloria Naylor’s, Women of Brewster Place:  “She ain’t nothin’ but a woman.”

Violence within the community of African ancestry takes as many forms as it does in any other cultural configuration of citizens.  Domestic violence has no boundaries that follow skin color, religious, socio- economic, age, gender or gender preference guidelines.  According to the American Medical Association, domestic violence is the fastest growing silent epidemic in America.  The Surgeon General has identified domestic violence as America’s number one social disease.  In New York City, the Health Department’s studies have found that Brooklyn is the borough where more Black women are murdered by their intimate partners; the Bronx is number two. Domestic violence is the last social issue to rest snuggly in “the closet” and will not come out without a great deal of kicking and screaming.  An unfortunate fact is that many who rail against internecine destruction, are abusive in their personal and family relationships. Others among the hearty protesters remain silent about their own abuse.

Double standards “double” the trouble families have when one parent  murders the other; and  is incarcerated; or, one parent murders the other and then commits suicide.  Children are doubly “parentless”.  Both parents’ families grieve. The economic devastation of losing two incomes is inarguable. Surviving family members must double their living accommodations to take in orphaned nieces, nephews, godchildren and the like. Boys raised in an abusive environment are more likely to engage in violent behavior and to continue the cycle of partner abuse.  Girls raised in violent homes are more likely to become promiscuous; or to become a runaway.  Boys are likely to protect their mothers by either killing or attempting to kill the batterer.  This has resulted in over sixty per cent of males, between the ages of 11 and 20, being incarcerated for murdering their mother’s batterer.  How many of them are of African ancestry is unclear. It would be unthinkable to state, especially in public, that the trail of black men who have been the victims of police violence deserved the excessive force that caused their injury or death.  Women affected by domestic violence, on the other hand, are more often than not scorned and blamed for the violence meted upon them.  “Serves her right.”  “She must like it; she keeps going back.”  “What did she expect?  Everybody knows how she is.”  “What else was he suppose to do?  She dissed him.”

So, what do we do?  The first step is toward community education. In their report titled, ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: An Agenda For the Nation, the Department Of Justice noted,

“Women of color.have struggled more than others to have their experiences with violence understood and addressed.  To be effective, intervention and prevention efforts must be culturally.appropriate, address across women’s lifespan, and be rooted in communities themselves.”1„1
Become familiar with the facts of the matter and release the myths. Brothers, declare a “misogyny free zone” in your physical, mental and social space.  Do not tolerate sexist or violent conversation; even in jest. Initiate action, discussion and education in your place of worship; in your fraternal and social organizations; in your place of employment.  Sisters, develop support systems for those in violent relationships.  Impress upon your daughters the need for zero tolerance of “play hitting, pulling or pushing”.  Guide them in their quest for loving and caring partners. No longer can we declare that we’re minding our “business”.  Domestic violence IS our business.  Remember that domestic violence, regardless of the gender of the abuser or the abused, is unacceptable.

In early April, in the 54th Circuit Court in Waco, Texas, the Kelly trial will begin.  It won’t be the caravan of buses transporting an outraged Black community that will bring this case to the world stage.  No clerical pilgrimage to another tragic landmark.  The cameras and peppered strokes on laptops will be heard because of the resilient, “Faith Based” Black woman; Carolyn Thomas, whose quest for life is indefatigable.  Maybe you won’t be there but wherever you are, you can do something.  If you know of someone in a violent relationship, there are five things that can be said to them.  The complexity of domestic violence may require that any or all of the following be repeated over the course of days, weeks or even years.  But it is a task that we must do.  We must save the children; we must save the “homegirlies”.  We must double our efforts; not double the standard.

1. It [the abuse] will only get worse.
2. I’m afraid for your safety.
3. I’m afraid for the safety of your loved ones.
4. You don’t deserve to be treated this way.
5. There’s help when you’re ready: THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE #:1-800-799-SAFE
(This number is available 24 hours a day; 365 days a year; from any state in the country.)
Roslyn Bacon is a retired educator and the Executive Director of JONAH VILLAGE, INC.; a non- profit, youth leadership organization dedicated to the prevention of domestic violence.
Contact:347-432-4617
Email: timetostopdv@hotmail.com
1 1 Ending Violence Against Women:  An Agenda for the Nation (2000). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

Stanley Kinard, Educator,Formally Announces His Candidacy For City Council, 41st District

Receives Key Endorsement From
Councilman Charles Barron

Stanley Kinard, an educator who has served as Founder and long-time Executive Director of the Carter C. Woodson Cultural Literacy Project, today announced his candidacy for City Council, 41st District, and received a significant endorsement from Councilman Charles Barron, (D-42) on the steps of City Hall.  Kinard is the first candidate to formally announce his run in the Democratic primary for what is expected to be a hotly contested race for the open seat.
Said Kinard:  “I am running to represent all the communities in the 41st, to bring active, dedicated leadership and to find creative solutions to long-term problems, particularly in education and economic development. I believe my experience makes me uniquely qualified to fight for improving the quality of life for residents of Bedford Stuyvesant, Brownsville, East Flatbush, and Ocean Hill.”
Joining Kinard was Councilman Charles Barron who gave his endorsement: “I support the candidacy of Stan Kinard because he is a man of integrity, honor, and accomplishment. I truly feel that his leadership is so sorely needed in the 41st Council district,” declared Barron. 
Barron continued:  “It is only through Stanley’s leadership that the residents of the 41st District will receive their rightful share of goods and services.”
Thanking Barron, Kinard said, “I am extremely gratified to receive Councilman Barron’s support.  I look forward to working with him in the Council to achieve our common goals.”
Kinard has served as Executive Director and Founder of the Carter C. Woodson Cultural Literacy Project since 1986, helping to improve academic skills through the appreciation of Black cultural heritage.  He is also a founder of Black New Yorkers for Educational Excellence and the Education Columnist for “Our Times Press.”  Earlier in his career, Kinard organized the coalition that installed Frank Mickens as principal at Boys and Girls High School, and, helped preserve Bedford Stuyvesant’s gifted and talented school, P.S./I.S. 308.  Kinard was also Founding Director of the Brownsville Heritage House, sponsoring cultural enrichment programs for the entire community.
Kinard was recently honored by Borough President Markowitz for leading the 10-year battle to successfully reclaim an abandoned lot at Sutter Avenue and build Children’s Park, NYC’s largest playground built through a public-private partnership.
Born in Brownsville, Kinard graduated from Tilden High School, received a B.A. from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and was awarded a prestigious Revson Fellowship in Public Policy from Columbia University.