Compensation Demanded For Wrongful Convictions in Infamous Central Park Jogger Case

Wrongfully convicted Kharey Wise and Raymond Santana stand with Councilman Charles Barron, Sharonne Salaam, mother of defendant Yusef Salaam, and Mrs. Wise, Mother of Kharey. Councilmember Barron is asking for copensation for the wrongful conviction.

The case of the Central Park Jogger may be 20-years-old for some, but it is as new as this morning for Kharey Wise, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Yusef Salaam and Raymond Santana the young men who were convicted of  raping Trisha Meili known as the Central Park Jogger, in April 19, 1989.  The convictions were based upon confessions extracted from these 14-16-year-olds, after 28 hours of enhanced interrogation by seasoned and “scripted” homicide detectives. (See Attorneys Michael Warren and Roger Wareham, page 2.)
In December of 2002, attorneys Michael Warren and Roger Warham filed a motion to vacate the convictions based on a confession from Matias Reyes a convicted serial rapist and murderer and a DNA match between Reyes and semen found on Ms. Meili.  The motion was affirmed and the boys, now men, are “free.”

“This is the 20th Anniversary of that event,” said Councilman Charles Barron at a press conference on the steps of City Hall.  Standing with him were Raymond Santana, Kharey Wise and his mother, Sharonne Salaam, mother of Yusef Salaam, Attorneys Alton Maddox and Colin Moore.  The councilman will be introducing legislation to provide compensation for the five men who were imprisonedÿfor up to 13 yearsÿbased on what attorney Colin Moore characterized as “abuses” in the District Attorney’s office.ÿÿ  “They have been robbed of their youth, robbed of the opportunity to develop their lives so they could have good jobs, good homes,” Barron continued.  “They don’t that opportunity because of the terrorist-like tactics of the police department, to get underage minors, interrogate them for 28-hours to force confessions out of them even after they so-called ‘confessed’ they knew what the boys was saying wasn’t consistent with what happened and they prosecuted them anyway.”
The councilman said that over 22 states have exoneration laws “that say if you have been unjustly convicted and you’re exonerated, that they state will pay.  It’s time for New York to catch up.”
The reporting of the case has been called a media frenzy with terms like “wolf pack” and “wilding” being used in the media at the time. Dr. James Macintosh of CEMOTAP (Committee to Eliminate Media Offensive to African People) said “The city must pay reparations.  The New York Post, Daily News, New York Times also must pay reparations.  The New York Post called them a rolling mass of pus.  Gerald Nachman called them a melanoma.  That’s a black tumor, making a racial allusion.  They didn’t need courts to lynch them, so you don’t need courts to repair them. Media lynchers need to ante up.”

Attorney Alton Maddox says Black votes will be critical in electing the next Manhattan District Attorney

  
 The icon for this lynch mob attitude was Donald Trump who was singled out for special mention.  “And as for Donald Trump,”  said Barron, “You’re the one who put out a big ad calling for a return of the death penalty and that these boys should be executed.  You should put out another ad that says ‘I was a fool and made a mistake.  If the city does not compensate them I will.”  However, because such an action would call for both humility and grace, not two of Mr. Trump’s known strong suits, this was probably a rhetorical suggestion.
Attorney Alton Maddox spoke to the systemic nature of the legal assault on the boys. “20 years ago there was  a tragedy in this city that we will never repay.  Young men under the age of 16 were in a situation where they could not defend themselves.  There were four Black lawyers who came forward in this case.  All four of them, after they came forward were disciplined by various grievance committees.  Three of them have been disbarred, and the other one was suspended for a substantial period of times.” 
Speaking of the defendants he says, “They have to be compensated.   We cannot ask people who have been crucified to resurrect themselves on their own.   We don’t expect any of them to be Jesus.”
With this being an election year and with Robert Morgenthau not running there is a wide open race for New York District Attorney. And Maddox promises that “Whoever the next D.A. is, he’s going to have to come through the Black community.  We want to know where he stands on compensation for the Central Park 6.  Nobody will become the next District Attorney of this County without us.”
A Personal Tragedy
Sharon Salaam, mother of Yusef Salaam.  “My son still struggles with this situation.  Recently there was an article about the case in the Daily News.  They went back years to find a picture of my son and over that picture it said ‘Matias Reyes, convicted rapist.’  When is justice going to happen for my son?  We cannot go forward without some kind of justice.  My son needs a chance to live his life as a decent human being because that’s what he is.  If we are denied justice at every avenue, when will justice prevail, not only for us but for all the others?”
Mrs. Wise: “You took something dear and precious away from me.  At the time I was five and a half months pregnant, and Kharey was sixteen, turning 17 and you just took him.  My son went to jail at sixteen and came out at 30.  How can he get an apartment to live in?  You say he can’t live with me because I was receiving Section 8, so you gave him nothing.  Today he has no house to live in.  He’s going from place to place.  You gave him no job.  You wouldn’t even give him therapy.  What you took from me and what you sent back is not the same.”
Raymond Santana: “I lost seven years of my life.  I lost my childhood.  I lost my mother, she died of cancer while I was in prison.  I lost talents, I used to draw.  I used to play basketball.  I lost all of that.  Now I’m just a man in this world trying to survive day-to-day.  I don’t want this to happen to anybody else’s kid.  It’s our duty to make sure others don’t go through this.  To be swallowed up and pushed to the side as though we were nothing.”
Colin Moore, attorney for Kharey Wise, said, “we’re not here seeking justice, justice has already spoken.  These young men are innocent.  District Attorney Morgenthau had to admit he made a mistake.  And he made a motion to invalidate the conviction of these young men.  But what we want is a special commission appointed to look into the abuses of the District Attorney’s office in this case.  This was the first case in which it became clear that you can actually force young men to convict themselves.  There is overwhelming evidence if you apply the correct pressure you can get people to convict themselves.  It is obvious from the transcripts that the District Attorney knew or should have known that the confessions were inconsistent with the evidence.”
Councilman Barron will be making a motion before the City Council

About the Author

has written 104 posts on this blog.

One Comment on “Compensation Demanded For Wrongful Convictions in Infamous Central Park Jogger Case”

  • Buddy George wrote on 23 November, 2010, 20:49

    A matter that needs investigated
    On case#VA107160
    People Vs buddy lee George 
    Norwalk superior court norwalk California division S
    Judge the Honorable Roger Ito
    Los Angeles county district attorney Kang. 
    A case that can be proved as unconstitutional due to the following
    1.) I was denied my due process rights. 
    2.) the district attorney had me charged with prison priors and strikes that I did not have and it was not until after the verdict did she admit her mistakes. 
    3.) I was denied to confront witnesses I supoened 5 officers and only one showed up. 
    4.) the only witness that showed up was detective hakala from Whittier police department he was the lead detective and expert witness. 
    5.) the was bias with the processing of evidence he used his own lab. 
    6.) he lied under oath by saying he removed the drugs before the pre search video because he had a dog. 
    7.) the evidence in the case had been destroyed before the trial
     Evidence was destroyed 5-29-09
    The verdict was read on 8-15-09
    8.) the attorney that represented me right before the trial caused a conflict of interest by violating attorney client privilege by having a meeting with the city of la mirada without my permission nor knowledge were he discussed my case were he was convinced by the city saying I should take a deal under the condition I move out of la mirada when I get out of prison. 
    9.) Henry salcido also told me at one point he didn’t care If I was innocent or guilty I should take a deal. 
    10.) he also told me at one point he was best friends with steve Cooley and if I gave him $180.000 and sign over the deed to our home he could make the case disappear. 
    11.) their was two retired district attorneys that were working for Henry salcidos law firm that were also over familiar with sheriffs and narcotics department that were involved in my case. 
    12.) through the whole case the la mirada mayor and council members had law enforcement harassing me their was about 300 or more calls made to law enforcement with the intent to have me harassed 
    13.) I can also prove false imprisonment. 
    14.) I was charged with possession for sales when no drugs were ever found to be in my possessing neither was any money ever recovered and according to the detective he found 13 dollars worth of drugs in our home all together in separate bags. 
    15.) it was unconstitutional for detective hakala to target me when their was 5 occupants living in our home at the time. 
    16.) the search warrant he used to get in our home the day he supposedly found the drugs was stamped denied. 
    17.) the second search warrant had a type -o- error and the name on the search warrant was Walter Eugene Farris a guy that I don’t know and neither did any one els that lived in our home and he had never been in our home. 
    18.)The attorney that represented me during the trial had not been given enough to to familiarize her self with my case the judge refused to give her time to overlook the case. 
    19.) after we picked the jurors one of the jurors was prejudice he said no matter what he would find me guilty because he hates drug dealers the judge still allowed juror # 19 to hang out with all the other jurors until he was replaced. 
    The following needs to be investigated
    1.) violation of due process rights
    2.) my state and federal rights were violated. 
    3.) false imprisonment
    4.) harassment 
    5.) negligent
    6.) malpractice
    7.) wrongful conviction
    8.) officer misconduct
    9.) judicial misconduct
    10.) cruel and unusual punishment. Email below evidence when the evidence had been destroyed a email from detective hakala to district attorney kang. 
    11.) the city of la mirada offered to buy our home at cost saying under the condition I couldn’t live in la mirada nor Whittier. 
    12.)la mirada law enforcement was raiding our home practically daily. 
    13.) before this case started detective jerry Reyes told me as he handed me his card with his hand writing on it that if I dident help him he would fuck me. 
    14.) detective hakala and district attorney kang kept inflicting lies on the jury. 
        
    Buddy George – VA107160From: joanne alberry
    View Contact To: LAURIE YTARTE —————–
    ————————————————————-
    – Laurie,here is the email from the Detective 
    telling the court that all the property was
    destroyed. Sorry about all of it. Feel free to mail
    me any payments you can at my office address
    4229 Main St Suite 4 Riverside CA 92501 I will
    let you know when I find an attorney who will
    take on a governemtn entity. good luck to you
    and Buddy,Joanne ———- Forwarded message
    ———-From: Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:23
    AMSubject: Fw: Buddy George – VA107160To:
    joannealberry@gmail.com Hi Joanne, Per our
    conversation, here is the email from Detective
    Hakala confirming that the evidence was
    destroyed. I will request that our matter be taken
    off calendar today. Thanks. ———————-
    Forwarded by Miriam Kang/DAUsers/NLADA on
    09/25/2009 07:22 AM ————————— To:
    cc: Subject: RE: Buddy George – VA107160 I
    contacted our central property and the items
    seized in the Buddy George case (408-15814-
    0460-184) were dispoed on 05-29-09. Any other
    questions just let me know. Eric ———————
    ———————————————————–
    From: MKang@da.lacounty.gov
    [mailto:MKang@da.lacounty.gov]Sent: Thu
    9/24/2009 2:49 PMTo: Hakala, Eric J.Subject:
    Buddy George – VA107160 Hi Detective Hakala,
    Just as a reminder, please email me a letter
    confirming that the the property booked into
    evidence for this case has been disposed of and
    the date of disposal. Thanks so much!
    Sincerely,Miriam KangDeputy District
    AttorneyTel: 562-807-7211 

Write a Comment

Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!

Copyright © 2012 Welcome to Our Time Press. All rights reserved.